1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Living heroes = strong culture. Think about it, if there's no living examples to follow or idolize, what does it say about the culture? It's dead/dying.

Legends are still important but shouldn't be the main source of inspiration, they're too distant on their own. How many people who hold up the Founders as heroes actually know anything about them besides a couple famous quotes; like that they were White supremacists?

Less than 10% probably, and 99% of them probably brush it off as "just how things were back then"

2
iDinduNuffin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which part of the New Testament, and why not the rest of the Bible?

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Abrahamic law you mean? As a symbol of "eternal" covenant. I'm glad you admit it's mutilation anyway. So, I mean... are you defending that God demanded it?

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course, I don't expect much when posts are always showing up on All, it attracts a constant flood of MAGA refugees, Christians and conservatives from the rest of the boards.

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

But why do we care more about the customs that arose in different places, instead of the DNA making that creativity and culture possible? It's not because we're the only ones who can, since Africans can too. It's pretty much the only thing they do because they can't organize society beyond the scale of tribes, so it's just endless ethnic wars. The fact our genes let us make far superior cultures (and we can actually understand genetic theory) is all the more reason for it to be central.

Fwiw, I think there can still be racial consciousness without necessarily being applied as broad as "White". If one of the cultures/ethnicities is distinct and strong enough to stay separate, it can be classed a race in itself. That's exactly what the Germans did. The important thing is for genetics to be central, knowing everything else (culture, language etc) is derivative.

0
iDinduNuffin 0 points ago +1 / -1

Do you pray often, invoking Christ? Do you read the bible regularly or go to church and sit through sermons every Sunday?

The only difference between Christianity and mass media and all that other stuff is the latter are brainwashing and corrupting Whites as a direct attack while Christians act as the controlled opposition, ensuring we stay docile, confused, and give no meaningful resistance.

National socialism is the only means of racial preservation, and it conflicts with virtually every element of Christian doctrine.

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

No I shouldn't, because I'm not a coward and I'm not subverted by ideas of immortality and paradise awaiting me after death. It's this world and the future of the White race that I think about. Suicide isn't a solution.

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's sitting right there in the OP's screencap and you still can't respond to it. I also literally just told you Christianity denies racial struggle and you ignored that too.

5
iDinduNuffin 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's just a gentler way to say we're ignorant of race.

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they polled fellow Whites it'd be the highest of the four.

4
iDinduNuffin 4 points ago +4 / -0

An extremely racist and race-conscious people wouldn't tolerate foreign races living in their midst.

It's still brainwashing for the most part, but it started a lot more than a hundred years ago and most here don't want to hear about it.

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's good, I was worried.

My explanation is that his words were “all men are created equal.” If there were exceptions to ALL, that’s not made clear.

That's not an explanation. We already know you're saying the same words as Thomas Jefferson, I'm asking you to explain why you think your usage of those words is the same as his.

Why you think his "all men" referred to the same thing as yours (every breathing individual classed as "Homo sapien" in modern taxonomy)

And why you think his "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" referred to the same thing as yours (the right for individuals to consume a community's resources without being subject to rules or standards about how they can live)

Why are you saying things weren't "made clear" when you only just learned that homosexuality and sodomy were illegal?

Contributions to society is not limited to bearing of children. By that logic a freeloading couple who make no contribution through their work and take from the government contributes more than a gay childless couple who hold roles in leadership or provide jobs to the community.

But they do.

"Take from the government" = public resources being redistributed.

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Basic parts of everyday life, I see. Not about our discussion then?

2
iDinduNuffin 2 points ago +2 / -0

I try not to judge it by the neo-redditors farming upvotes with outrage porn.

2
iDinduNuffin 2 points ago +4 / -2

Anyone who has to pretend victory's guaranteed is a coward, too weak-minded to accept the reality of what's at stake. You'll never devote yourself to the struggle for survival if you think a world without Whites is impossible.

6
iDinduNuffin 6 points ago +6 / -0

In other words yes the White man is being outnumbered, and instead of confronting and dealing with that, we're gonna cope and delude ourselves to think our home nations being overrun by every foreign race on the planet is the same as a group of trained, armed White soldiers making a tribe of literal spear-chucking Africans run from a battle that one time.

How are the Dutch faring in Africa today?

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah. I love life, unlike Christians.

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Clearly people do care. The Christian larpers want to feel like they're stalwart warriors of morality and they get upset when someone like me proves they're still falling for lies. But a few learn.

You said Nietzsche went insane (he did), now he was insane his entire life? The insights he was able to give are even more impressive then. Are you sure you're not just dumb, since I'm guessing you thought the Parable of the Madman was supposed to be a defense of Christianity?

-1
iDinduNuffin -1 points ago +1 / -2

You sweet summer child, lol no.

Yes. Well maybe you personally don't, because you more than likely don't know shit about Christian theology besides whatever you want it to be.

That's who you want to pattern yourself after?

It really irks you that there are people who can see straight through you, doesn't it?

He was a total nutjob, as are his ideas.

And yet they perfectly explain the pitiful weakness and helplessness of Christians and the role it's played in putting us on our current course.

But by all means, you go ahead and stick with your "God transformed himself into a human baby and grew up in the Middle East and performed magic tricks to fulfill prophecies and then got crucified to death in order to redeem humanity from the magic sin we inherited from the first two humans God created, and if we believe in him we can be immortal and live with God forever!"

These are definitely the ideas of a sane and rational person.

view more: Next ›