From left to right: emasculate "man" who looks exactly like the fucking coomer meme, scott pilgrim art whore, ugly ass lady who might be (probably is) a troomer, a fatass neck beard with neon colored hair that can give fucking jupiter a run for its money in mass
These four people alone represent almost every leftist. Why do they ALL look like this?
Britain has Alzheimer's. So does Germany, and the USA, and Scandinavia... Actually, scratch that, every country that is white outside of eastern europe has Alzheimer's
Sus has been zoomer/joggerspeak for a long ass time. I've heard it for years and years, but it was never that common. That fucking game among us made everyone say it all the damned time
Maybe it's white because beer was only ever brewed in Europe and the middle east, and after islam it was only brewed in Europe for a good over half a millennium. Perhaps that's why. Also whites have more tolerance for alcohol anyway, fucking almost every alcoholic beverage on earth is produced in white countries primarily.
Ok then I'll accept this study and be on my way to collect my disability check
Just do it the 1950s gi generation parent way. Spank them when they do something really bad. If you don't hit them over every little thing, they won't fear you, if you do nothing, they'll abuse your kindness. I use that generation specifically as a reference because most boomers I've met have a healthy respect for their parents, but still tell stories of the time "they'd get a whooping"
The only thing that generation really did wrong and why so many boomers turned into cunts was sheer ignorance. They didn't know what the media and press could do to influence their children negatively because they didn't grow up with anything like that. Similarly, gen x turned gen z into faggots because they didn't understand how bad the internet could be. Us millennials and gen z who are redpilled have that knowledge, and can avoid it.
The boxes are most likely empty and just glued together for display purposes.
I don't know how to tell her this but her husband may actually be sigmund freud
I got put into one of those classes, my ninth grade marks were abysmal because I didn't give a shit back then. So I got that as a class period, it was a mix of autistic kids and people like me that had shitty grades. Anyway, I found it easy to talk to that teacher about shit and have an open discussion, and I've talked to other people who have those teachers and they say the same thing. Maybe try to just talk to them about it
My hair is stick straight with no wave at all. I'm used to it, and that's the hair type I'm also attracted to on women because of being used to it. Most whites don't have big ass curls like Jews do. So of course most of them won't find it attractive. Most Mediterraneans have wavy hair, most nords and slavs have straight hair, none have coily hair as an average unless they are a Jew
Monarchy is impossible to sell to americans, aristocracy is the next best thing. Just roll back the clock to America in the 1700s. It'll solve itself
Nope because being Jewish will be illegal 😎
I would go even further, and say that even those who own property and military members should be required to get a score of at least ninety on a competency test that tests their knowledge of the government and the country's history
No, giving women the right to vote did not lead to this. Giving anyone the right to vote except for the nobility of america led to this. Repeal every amendment that involves voting that was made after the 1700s
This is shit that the libleft says. The authleft will tell you that it absolutely was real communism and they are proud of it. I prefer the latter personally, because at least they're honest. I have read Marx, in depth, I have read literally everything written by marx and engels. I can say beyond the shadow of a doubt that maoist china, pre khrushchev ussr, and north korea were (and one country) ARE real communist countries. Marx wanted a dictatorship period before total worker "emancipation". Ignoring this is failing at even being a Marxist
That's what I believe it should have done, was divert soviet divisions from the west. And it didn't have to be an invasion of russia's far east, which had nothing, I understand how much of a burden that would have been. It could have much more easily been a strike from china into central asia. There was a big swathe of just "china" in between machukuo and central asia, but resistance there would have been minimal at best because it's the least populated part of the country. As well as the fact that china had a shitty military that got decimated by numerically inferior japanese forces anyway. We may also consider the fact that central asia always had issues with the ussr and would have possibly even sided en masse with the Japanese forces.
Germany also could have attacked through central asia because it is easier to attack than the west, and they could have ended up with volunteers from this area as well. Then invaded the ussr from the south, and they would have been marching onto moscow from the east of the city, rather than from the west, which was where most of the Soviet military was to begin with, instead of trudging through a numerically superior from from the get go for a failed invasion of moscow. They also could have done a balkan campaign with the Italians, or even invaded from the north with landings. There's a whole lot of ways to invade Russqia and they picked the worst one, beating on its shield instead of attacking from behind. That is why barbarossa failed. But regardless of what happened, a seizure of moscow would have been a German victory of the entire operation. The red army was not fanatically loyal as they are portrayed... At all, they lost several hundreds of thousands just by surrender because they thought that the Germans were better people than the Soviet government. The only thing that kept the army in tact was the no step backwards order. So a seizure of moscow and elimination of the kremlin government would have been a German victory and minor resistance would remain, most of the red army would collapse under mutiny
Italy could have also contributed way more than they actually did, which would have given the Germans a huge advantage. Italian soldiers and equipment were top tier and legitimately rivalled the wehrmacht, but they had shitty leadership which is why they failed all the time. If they had a very large division of the Italian army with them, and invaded from the balkans, there is another scenario where barbarossa could have worked out, and this is probably the best scenario for the axis. But again, Germany beat on the shield of their enemy instead of attacking their legs or hitting them from behind, and italy's contribution was negligible because their idiotic generals were busy shaking their dicks around in countries that nobody gives a fuck about
Back a long time ago, the usa had this huge scare campaign against fat in foods. The evidence this didn't exist or at least had less effect in Canada is the inclusion of lard in the Canadian version. That little bit of lard goes a long way. Americans got scared of fat so they got rid of it in all the food, in order to get the flavor back they had to add a whole ton of extra shit. Cut forward to about 30 years later, and now it's common knowledge most fats except trans fats are actually good for you, but companies learned that the extra shit was cheaper. So they remain
God will punish you for saying it
The only alcohol i like are solid vodka and wine. Not bad I give it a 8/10. If I wanted a fruit smoothie i would just drink a smoothie, if I want alcohol I will just drink alcohol, no point, in my mind, in turning things into things they are not. Wine is excusable because it doesn't taste anything like grape juice and is unique. Beer tastes like piss and flavored beer tastes like hairspray
Operation barbarossa was a kneejerk reaction to a learned about soviet plan to invade western europe. This can be proven in how hastily and poorly planned it was, every other German invasion was well planned and executed, but the Soviet invasion was sloppy and wasn't up to snub with the reich's plans prior. One can infer that they initially had no plan to do so, or if they did, it wasn't a priority to them, because considering how excellent German military tactics had been prior, it's odd that they did so poorly in Russia.
Another factor in how awfully it was executed was because of japan being too much of a pussy to reinvade the ussr after khalkhin gol, which was completely doable in 1941 during operation barbarossa and prior to their idiotic decision to attack pearl harbor. Japan in this scenario would function as the eastern arm of a pair of tongs crushing the red army. Considering how well Germany did despite poor planning, if they had the Japanese army to the east, the ussr would have fallen. Japan and Germany would get new territories and also revenge for Japan for khalkhin gol. Obviously this never happened though, because japan's military planning during ww2 was absolutely abysmal
Absolutely based. We are returning to monke
kind of. I'm not sure how it is in Australia, but here in the USA groups like blm tend to lump Asians in with white people, and say that they have "white privelage" as well, despite not being white. Asians in the usa are held to the same scrutiny as whites are, or at least similar levels of it. They don't have any defense towards being racist unless they call out other Asians or whites, but they'll get the same shitfest as white people do if they say anything about Jews, blacks, Hispanics, or practically anything else. Strangely, whites are allowed to shit on Asians and vice versa, stereotypes against both are pretty much accepted, but any word from both group about any other race and you risk losing your fucking job
It is called OFFENSIVE JOKES because it is OFFENSIVE. Fucking hell, these people would probably cry if they ever watched an episode of south park, or any live action sitcom made in the 70s
This is how I've been writing my (printed, I normally write in cursive) Z's for my entire life. I feel good about that now