2
TruthDefenseForce 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tough to find solid info on this. I think it was just a bit of a logistics issue. No one probably cared enough to be bothered.

3
TruthDefenseForce 3 points ago +3 / -0

The real solution is that all men should stop using social media.

1
TruthDefenseForce 1 point ago +1 / -0

If China reestablished the traditional role of women in modern times, they'd do significantly better than us and we'd be forced to adapt in order to compete. We may die out but it already looks to be the case that we are, I'd like at least an opportunity for us to do the right thing and that requires competing forces.

1
TruthDefenseForce 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. My take away was essentially Paganism is a blank slate for everyone because there really isn't any foundation. People who call themselves Pagans just say Paganism is whatever they want it to be. From what I've gathered, this appears to be true. When Pagans attacks Christians they mainly attack modern subverted Christianity and ignore the good in the traditional roots of the religion. When Christians attack Pagans, they usually lack a reason other than "they're Pagans". Neither attack is productive and tends to miss the point because both groups likely agree on far more than they disagree.

2
TruthDefenseForce 2 points ago +2 / -0

I feel some of those topics are important for beginners. I've been a part of a lot of Pagan communities that attack Christians so I made a Pagan vs. Christianity topic once here to try and get Christian's take on things. I took a lot away from it tbh. I'd only heard the Pagan's argument before.

2
TruthDefenseForce 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I don't actually believe in accelerationism. History tells me societies just die they don't rise from the grave. You never heard of Greece's fall then rise or Rome's fall then rise or Egypt's fall then rise or the British Empires? Or... When civilizations fall, they fall. There is no accelerationism that ends well. It's just accelerating our death. If we want to stop it we need to fight back.

2
TruthDefenseForce 2 points ago +3 / -1

The Romans tried to stop it. I suspect this psyop is because "Rome" represents "white supremacy" and white culture essentially. Shift blame to Romans in order to eventually attack Roman culture. Philosophers like Plato/Aristotle will be disowned because Romans killed Jesus, etc... It's all part of the total attack on white people.

2
TruthDefenseForce 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pretty much any culture prior to women entering the workforce, so how things were everywhere for thousands of years up until a century ago, is what I'd like to be. I have 0 desire to work with women and have them partake in industry or politics. I feel it has been objectively a negative for our society as a whole.

1
TruthDefenseForce 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you're for limited government then I will simply agree with you. In a society with minimal government, a man's value goes up and what I seek from women will became the norm. The matriarchy that exists today and the "privileges" afforded to women only exist because of the government's oppression of men. Remove the government and the role I say women should fill is what by nature they will end up fulfilling. So yes, less government please. 0% taxes, no redistribution programs, no laws over and above the constitution, no civil rights act, nothing. As limited as possible. In such a society, I get the outcome i want anyway.

2
TruthDefenseForce 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is the ideal role for a woman within the community. The community should ensure that is the role women follow. The way in which women are in modernity is decadent and isn't actually good for the community as a whole.

3
TruthDefenseForce 3 points ago +3 / -0

What a useless survey. Did it bother to ask how many of the vacations the man took were because the woman demanded it?

4
TruthDefenseForce 4 points ago +4 / -0

If all the humans and elves mixed together thus removing all pure blooded high elves from the world, would that be a good thing? If the elves only wanted an elven nation for themselves, would that be a bad thing?

3
TruthDefenseForce 3 points ago +4 / -1

It's actually quite sad as a community. They understand all the cultural subversion going on but refuse to acknowledge it's Jews doing it. Most over there blame feminism for all the problems as if women alone were the reasons society is the way it is despite the fact women have never had any true power in society and still don't. I got suspended for 30 days on that community for trying to point out the Jewish problem.

I suspect the mods are Jews as is usually the case and are specifically controlling the opposition so everyone focuses on feminism as the problem and prevent anyone from branching out. There's a number on the community who do get it but they won't say anything because the mods do ban.

I was actually going to comment in your topic on KA2 about how brave you were and would likely get banned. I hesitated because I thought you were factual enough to avoid a ban.

3
TruthDefenseForce 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think some people who subscribe to the this is hell theory think if they make it bad enough, God will intervene.

3
TruthDefenseForce 3 points ago +3 / -0

I mean, I understand why feminists are mad but they misplace their anger as always. The problem isn't the patriarchy, IT'S THE LACK OF PATRIARCHY. Women created their own problem when they emasculated men. Now, they're reaping the consequences. Unfortunately, as quality men were saying from the start, feminism is actually counter-women. it's literally a movement for angry ugly butthurt single women that are mad at men for not wanting to fuck them. These women are willing to crash and burn the entire community out of spite and they don't actually care about women's interests. Women are kind of fucked now because there doesn't exist enough strength left in men to fix the problem. Historically, the current modern problems have always been fixed by foreigners conquering the weakened society. I've yet to see of any historic examples where societies have ever managed to reverse the decadence we're now facing.

In short, the real problem isn't men and their power but a lack of men and their power. A true patriarchy wouldn't have trans people and gender roles would be highly structure. Women would actually be able to be women and treated how they truly want to be treated under a patriarchy. They'd also get an abundance of the kinds of men they want. The problems for both men and women in our society can be attributed to the weakening of the patriarchy.

3
TruthDefenseForce 3 points ago +5 / -2

Pick two scenarios

Scenario 1: We kill all the Jews

Scenario 2: We do nothing

Which scenario do you think would lead to a better outcome for us?

6
TruthDefenseForce 6 points ago +6 / -0

Two more weeks to flatten the government

14
TruthDefenseForce 14 points ago +14 / -0

I mean if we accepted we're in hell, wouldn't the logical step be to be as degenerate and chaotic as possible? Is this maybe the basis for leftist ideology?

1
TruthDefenseForce 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude, it's way bigger than "no one outside of patriots.win". Some American politicians like Ted Cruz was saying it. The Canadian government actually released a statement banning the use of the phrase "Let's go Brandon" and other "doublespeak" by any public servants. Universities have also been reportedly having to deal with student shouting it at sporting games etc...

Most average people have no clue what anything means so don't read too much into the fact that the plebs didn't know what it meant. It's actually kind of funny and these types of fads actually do help to strengthen movements so don't criticize too hard.

Yes, at the end of the day we should all have guns ready and be in the middle of a civil war hanging all the politicians but we aren't there yet.

2
TruthDefenseForce 2 points ago +2 / -0

Normies get it but the reason normies still like insurance is because everyone is living outside their means.

Someone will buy a $100k truck who probably should be buying a $20k truck at most. If something major happens to the $100k truck without insurance to cover it, the person is completely and utterly ruined. With a $20k truck, it's a huge setback but likely fairly recoverable. This is how most insurance works. People spend outside their means such that any little "down" in their life is catastrophic so they're forced to buy insurance to make sure nothing bad happens. Unfortunately, often the insurance doesn't even payout when people need it to which is one of the ironic parts of insurance.

Unfortunately, most governments mandate a lot of insurance which keeps insurance rooted in our society. Insurance is a scam for the most part and absolutely no insurance should be mandated by the government.

15
TruthDefenseForce 15 points ago +15 / -0

Correct and if you put a $ on this domestic labour, most women in a family aren't actually adding any value with the work that they do, they'd be better off just doing the domestic labour. This is especially true if you reduced taxes to stop any public funding toward this domestic labour with especially being the case on public education vs. home-schooling.

Not to mention the fact that 9-5 HR jobs stress women out and change their personalities to be much less feminine and attractive to men. And it takes way more time doing 9-5 HR then it does doing housework.

Oh and then factor in school costs and the indoctrination that happens to women in post-secondary. Not to mention fucking 200+ men in university which devalues a woman in a relationship immensely due to the personality changes such experience causes.

There is seriously 0 good in women going to school and working 9-5 HR jobs. We'd be much happier and better off as a society if women married a man then stayed home to take care of the household.

2
TruthDefenseForce 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's a biblical argument for it. It's an argument of course. It's not like the bible specifically says "yes do this" but it's not like it precludes it either. That's why different sects of Christianity have different beliefs on it.

I personally am of the belief that the entire purpose of the Roman Catholic Church was to ensure the survival of the Roman Empire. As traditional Roman values were beginning to die out in the empire and Christianity was taking over, the Roman elite decided to come up with a strategy to tackle this problem. Their strategy was the Roman Catholic Church. Create a church hierarchy for Christianity. Convert to Christianity Consider it the only true Christianity. Kill all those who oppose it. Make everything written in Latin such that only your lackeys could read anything. Don't make copies for anyone except your lackeys. This in effect gives you control over the church and people through the religion. The Catholic Church thus simply became an arm of the Roman Empire. Now this obviously was not explicit in its conception (because it couldn't be for it to work) so over time Rome fell but the Catholic Church evolved into its own thing.

We can evaluate it now on whether it was a good or bad thing. In the end, I think it was a good thing overall. Without the Catholic Church, I don't think the west would have progressed as well as it did.

36
TruthDefenseForce 36 points ago +37 / -1

China understand the problem but doesn't understand the solution. Get women out of education, the workplace and put them back into the home. Deleting feminists won't be enough. Once you start looking into the truth behind women working, you'll find that women in the workplace doesn't actually add any value for a society.

view more: Next ›