1
HolocoughSurvivor 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't care for teenagers sperging out on the internet and I don't care for teen slang either. This weakness is making conpro into a nigger slang retard site

Anyone who legitimately discourages building white families needs to go. That includes making disparaging blanket statements about white women. Men are meant to lead women like children.

-2
HolocoughSurvivor -2 points ago +4 / -6

Get off of the internet. It's poisoning your mind. There still time for you to learn to be a man and answer to God.

2
HolocoughSurvivor 2 points ago +4 / -2

No I think you should leave. I've been here for 2 years. We're all tired of fags. We don't want to see your autistic masturbator rage here anymore. You provide nothing of valuable on conpro, or in real life

-1
HolocoughSurvivor -1 points ago +7 / -8

Ah well you should speak English instead of nigger.

Is there someone groveling here in this thread to get a woman's favor? Considering there are less than 5 female users here and nobody here is going to identify themselves, that seems impossible. Maybe you just like using nigger words instead of engaging in discussion

0
HolocoughSurvivor 0 points ago +4 / -4

What is simping? Can you define it with English words? I don't speak nigger

5
HolocoughSurvivor 5 points ago +11 / -6

Simp is nigger zoomer speak. White American men should use English

1
HolocoughSurvivor 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's called a "Jussie". A sad creature possessing neither the strength nor guile of it's combined parts

2
HolocoughSurvivor 2 points ago +3 / -1

So talk to someone IRL ffs. 3 guys are a militia. This forum is not the place to organize retard. Buy some guns while you still can. If everyone in your area is ZOG'd then MOVE.

It is all falling down. That's biblical. We will be a small remnant. I know you know that so stop being a faggot. You aren't doing anything to raise people up and bring them to God.

3
HolocoughSurvivor 3 points ago +3 / -0

In a way you are right.

On the other hand, I think we should worry about preserving the 95% of true whites rather than the 5% subgroup who literally worship Satan and have disproportionately high monkey admixture. Who actively trying to destroy the genetic makeup of the rest of us to elevate themselves.

If you had 12 children and one of them was psychotic and malformed and was constantly trying to kill the others, it would be in everyone's best interest to disown them and not concern yourself with their fate

2
HolocoughSurvivor 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do the same thing lol. I always make a confused/disgusted look and get physically distant from them. It's partially intentional I guess but it's mostly an unconscious reaction. Trust me, they know what people think. There is no earthly redemption for a racemixing white women

1
HolocoughSurvivor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well said.

Your username makes you seem like a u/then alt btw haha. Obv you aren't since you aren't a Pakistani robot but still funny

3
HolocoughSurvivor 3 points ago +3 / -0

This just made me remember how much I miss u/jim_the_doge

1
HolocoughSurvivor 1 point ago +2 / -1

The levant is not a huge desert like ZOG war movies portray.

Our great kings fought and died to take that land so that it could be a place of glory to God, the King of kings. Not satan, who the Edomites and Muslims worship. Louis IX did not fight to expand his own fiefdom. He fought to reclaim the lands of the true children of God.

It was the first settling point of white civilization after the last great cataclysm. It is our homeland and we should strive reclaim it. Under these circumstances it's laughable to say, I know. Europe first, sure. That's a matter of deportation and/or extermination. Purely a political matter.

I don't believe we can reclaim God's glory. It's written that the world will fall. We are likely coming to the point of the weed separating from the chaffe. It will be a small remnant that remains. But it's still the job of the White Man, the image of our Lord, to TRY.

9
HolocoughSurvivor 9 points ago +9 / -0

Right. Aligning with the majority in a world of NPCs is not something to aspire to.

11
HolocoughSurvivor 11 points ago +11 / -0

You're forgetting legitimate Christians and people who just have a distaste for whores.

4
HolocoughSurvivor 4 points ago +4 / -0

Imagine paying hundreds of dollars to get blue balls from whores for hours and drink overpriced drinks in a room that smells like semen and cigarettes.

1
HolocoughSurvivor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. Shills are easy an fun to deflect. The overall decline of maturity in the discussion since conpros inception makes it a less desirable place to engage in.

Calling each other faggots and niggers is all good and well, but it should be in good faith. A litmus test to drive out the weak. Backed up by argument. Otherwise it's just trolling. Growing up is a bitch eh?

2
HolocoughSurvivor 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't speak for OP but the issue I see is low effort but inflammatory commenters that never explain themselves consistently low effort and always toxic. They will copy and paste the same nasty, 1 sentence comments to multiple threads, knowing that they will be downvoted, but this community still being small and relatively low traffic, they will get visibility and piss people off because they comment daily. I'm sure we are all familiar with a few of them. They are a net negative to discussion and trust within a community. This is who I view as bad actors.

You are right that we have to have our guards up and, as you know, shill accusations have always been a normal and expected part of the community. And there are definitely more shills than ever. Despite that, here has still always been a sense of community at conpro. I think we can handle shills, but immaturity is a bigger problem here.

20
HolocoughSurvivor 20 points ago +20 / -0

It's a shillbot. They come up with nonsense names that reference something in American culture and get paid to make these kind of comments all day.

1
HolocoughSurvivor 1 point ago +1 / -0

It depends on how you interpret Genesis 1 and 2. And how much you see as poetic metaphor. Which I think it's a silly to discard any possiblity of it not being entirely literal.

The idea be that Adam and Eve were peoples not a single person. Doesn't it seem odd that 2 people would have enough children to populate Earth by themselves, and that brothers and sisters would marry each other? Alternatively, marrying second or third cousins is safe and has been done in every civilization throughout history.

Secondly, Kain was cast away to wander and took a wife of a woman of the land of Nod. Are we to assume this was a descendent of Adam and Eve's children to? It's seems more like he was being punished and disallowed from marrying within his own people.

I think if we can understand the individuals in these stories as metaphors for people's, it makes a lot more sense. This is after all, if you believe the bible, the oldest story in existence. It would make sense to describe large events in a simplified yet still accurate way. This is how most other ancient stories are written.

32
HolocoughSurvivor 32 points ago +35 / -3

Muslims are mostly not white. Some are whiter than others. That's the crux of the issue. Nothing else matters. They are definitely better than the Pharisees, at least in some of their beliefs.

How about we deport them all, take back the near east, and then let the monkies do as they wish in the lands that are unsuitable to civilized life?

1
HolocoughSurvivor 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's hard to say exactly what their origin is, but they are a different species. At best, they may be related to the line of Adam but interbred with lesser species and became what they are today.

1
HolocoughSurvivor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like I said, I have been having them long before knowing what the common vernacular was or before the "inception" film came out. As I'm sure many people have for length of human existence. It's not world changing. It's a very interesting experience. It's just that if have lucid dreams, you know it. It is funny that midwits are here comment ing that it doesn't exist just because it doesn't come naturally to them. Probably no internal monologue types.

2
HolocoughSurvivor 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do find it funny the comments saying "there's no such thing as lucid dreaming". If you can't define the difference between normal dreams and lucid dreams, you just haven't had them. It's not something that comes naturally to everyone and that's fine. But it's laughable as someone who experiences them unintentionally to see people saying it's fake. Lol

view more: Next ›