248
Comments (85)
sorted by:
48
deleted 48 points ago +49 / -1
28
TheRealPizzaPope 28 points ago +29 / -1

Sandniggers are based as long as they stay in the Middle East

12
voyager14 12 points ago +12 / -0

Or a certain nightclub in the US

7
January22nd2022 7 points ago +7 / -0

"It's not gay if you behead the other guy right after."

Old islamic philosophy.

23
Cheffery 23 points ago +24 / -1

I’m surprised they know

43
Hyperborean_ [S] 43 points ago +44 / -1

Why? You would assume that Iraqis would know who is responsible for what was essentially a decades long occupation of their nation. In general, I have found that people from the middle east are usually based when it comes to the jewish problem - much more so than Americans and other westerners.

23
Telia 23 points ago +25 / -2

Jews killed Muhammed . And unlike with Christianity, Jews today cant use the same excuses ( "Jesus was a Jew" or that "the Romans did it") to cover up that assassination ..

22
FederalAgentJack 22 points ago +24 / -2

A Jewess poisoned Muhammad after he had killed her family. In fact, Muhammad was so retarded he allowed her to cook a meal for him and his followers.

He then spent years in agony, until he felt as though his aorta was being cut, and died. Coincidentally, he claimed years prior that if he was a false prophet, than "allah" would sever his aorta.

And they say God doesn't have a sense of humor.

9
buck-breaker 9 points ago +9 / -0

Muhammed was almost as evil as a typical rabbi and the Quaron about half as vile as the Talmud, which is REALLY fucking bad.

4
January22nd2022 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yet is a perfect role model according to the Quran (some serious lack of self-awareness right there), meaning moslems have to accept that.

3
January22nd2022 3 points ago +3 / -0

"A Jewess poisoned Muhammad after he had killed her family."

Which, to be fair and assuming this wasn't made up to cover up something significantly more shameful, was a somewhat based thing for her to do.

3
al-phabitz89 3 points ago +3 / -0

What did Muhammad do to the Jewess?

1
Birmig 1 point ago +1 / -0

Showed mercy, but then later killed her because someone else in their group had died of the poison.

1
Telia 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jews had been trying to assassinate Muhammad multiple times long before he killed her family.

1
FederalAgentJack 1 point ago +2 / -1

I bet many people were. When you form a violent cult that is slaughtering everyone in it's wake, you tend to want the leader dead.

The Jewess at Khaybar was no different. She had her entire family killed in front of her by Muhammad, so by appearing stoic and sympathetic with his cause, she got close to him and fed him a poisoned lamb meal.

3
Telia 3 points ago +3 / -0

Meh. You will never make me side with a jew. jews deserve everything they get and more. Also they were originally trying to kill him long before that, cause they thought he was a false prophet not because of his violence.

0
January22nd2022 0 points ago +2 / -2

Assuming the story doesn't exist to cover-up that Mohammed was eaten by a herd of pigs while drunk, died from STDs or got publicly called out, then shanked in the throat by a male lover! -D

2
buck-breaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's because westerners have been gaslit into seeing the most privileged people on the planet as victims.

24
MisterMeister 24 points ago +24 / -0

Middle Easterners have been saying that American troops have been doing the bidding of Israel for over 20+ years now.

4
Geralt_of_Rivia1 4 points ago +5 / -1

They have been saying that since... George Washington was in office due to US intervention with barbary pirates.

10
unplugger3214 10 points ago +11 / -1

Barbary pirates were violent fags and should have all been killed regardless of jewish interventions.

3
Lopied1 3 points ago +5 / -2

Well guess what. The United States of America is a Jewish nation to the core. And it will always come to defend the abhorrent religion no matter what

4
buck-breaker 4 points ago +4 / -0

Since the Wilson administration, at least.

1
January22nd2022 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not back then, tho.

1
January22nd2022 1 point ago +1 / -0

True! True!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
lariloles 3 points ago +3 / -0

and they are absolutely right

1
spez__ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Clean Break memo.

1
when_we_win_remember 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well the US isn't over there securing a supply of oil, contrary to the old assertions of some leftists. I can't figure out wtf else there is to do over there.

1
throwaway_27_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Keep ((their)) enemies weak, and control the in-house population with stories of foreign boogeymen.

22
superspathi 22 points ago +22 / -0

Compare the American reasons for invading Iraq to the Russian reasons for invading Ukraine. Russia shares a border with Ukraine and there's a sizable population of ethnic Russians in Ukraine fighting a civil war against Ukrainian nationalists that overthrew the previous Russia friendly government. And there are longstanding historic ties, with Kiev being the city where the Russian empire was founded.

What justified the US invasion of Iraq? A bunch of shabby lies. We went to a country 8000 miles away and destroyed it so Haliburton could overcharge the US taxpayer for slop they fed to troops and all the other disgusting graft. Our leaders that inflicted this shame on us should have been lynched.

And look at how the neocons rage about Iran helping to kill our forces in Iraq while we help to kill untold numbers of Russians in Ukraine. It pisses me off. Total hypocrisy and no concept of honor. Just ultimate faggotry.

4
Newuser99 4 points ago +4 / -0

Those Haliburton trucks cost a few hundred k and when they got a flat tire, they just torched the whole thing to get a new one

2
January22nd2022 2 points ago +2 / -0

"ukrainians" are Russians that has been separated for centuries from the rest of Russia, first by the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth and then by Austria.

Then, the Bolsheviks separated the Belarussian and ukie SSRs from the Russian one (drawing the current land border between the two) first because imperialism bad and the Pale of Settlements where the majority of jews in Imperial Russia still lived. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_of_Settlement

On March 20 (April 2 N.S.), 1917, the Pale was abolished by the (((Provisional Government))) decree, On the abolition of religious and national restrictions. No coincidence the US under the Woodrow Wilson administration would join the Entente side less than a month later.

The Russian Empire should at least have reclaimed Galicia when they saved the Austrian Empire in the 1848-1849 revolution but they believed they had a pro-Monarchy kindship with it. This was false, the Austrian regime was not clever enough to see things their way.

1
January22nd2022 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Italian_War_of_Independence The Austrians later got served a bitch lasagna. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austro-Prussian_War Then another bitch lasagna.

2
throwaway_27_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just ultimate faggotry.

Pretty much what the Russian-Ukrainian conflict is, too. Putin is a shabbos goy that surrounds himself with kikes, and on the other ((side)), you've got ((Zelenskyy)). This conflict is again to screw over the Russian and Ukrainian peoples, as they have been for the past century, and give the West a boogeyman so their people can be controlled, too.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5OqIXqo9x5xj7Gn29Ctmulk9sFxLGawn

https://www.jpost.com/jewish-world/jewish-features/at-putins-side-an-army-of-jewish-billionaires

1
January22nd2022 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not quiet.

The Russian gov tried to freeze the conflict for far too long because that is what the judenites wanted. But they are fighting this war seriously and with barely 10% of their military forces.

The ukie side is the one fighting that cringe, faggot jihad.

The very joke war that Hitler (allegedly) speculated jews would turn warfare into if left on their own devices. Dunno if that quote was legit, tho.

1
when_we_win_remember 1 point ago +1 / -0

Invading Iraq may have very well been against Iran in a way. Yes, Iraq was/is an enemy of Iran, but now Iraq is a US military base and kind of a puppet state on Iran's doorstep.

I guess what I'm saying is the justification of the invasion of Iraq was just that -- a casus belli. The reason is something else.

12
Cheesepopel 12 points ago +12 / -0

Israel was desperate to break Iraq into three sections. They did it by tricking Saddam to attack Kuwait after Saddam decided to stop trading oil in the dollar standard. Its hard to tell how many Iraqi women and children were raped by US soldiers like in Vietnam.

15
Hyperborean_ [S] 15 points ago +15 / -0

Israel was also motivated to overthrow Saddam because of his longstanding support for pan-Arab nationalism and the financial support that he provided to the widows and children of Palestinian suicide bombers. At this point he had also outlived his usefulness to his American handlers following the Iran-Iraq war.

2
January22nd2022 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also, his "WMD" projects was the #1 guarantee for legit sovereignty. Should never have been distracted by Kuawit before the capability to destroy Tel-Aviv and Haifa.

Notice the difference with the (((artificial)))) anti-Russian nationalism in eastern Europe which is all about submitting to NATO and the EU foreign policy much like how they aligned with the Soviet Union during the cold war albeit but with much less jew-like pretenses, hypocrisy and lying.

"Nationalism" that comes with ((("independent" central banks))) too, only the Hungarian gov showed a willingness to limit that but backed out due to threats of economic sanctions from the EU, not the Russian federation.

1
January22nd2022 1 point ago +1 / -0

Saddam Hussein > His own man, served his people.

Baltics or Poles kvetching about Russia > Following the orders of the judenites cuz its the easiest path.

5
Vicenzo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well there are a lot of black and Muslim troops in the US army so I'm sure rape was high

3
RandoTexasDude 3 points ago +4 / -1

Why the fuck would anyone want to stick their dick in an Arab woman?

5
OrganicMolecules 5 points ago +6 / -1

The same people who want to copulate with Asians.

Don't give me the "based submissive" excuse, you lousy zoophiles.

1
January22nd2022 1 point ago +2 / -1

Very good!

1
January22nd2022 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yellow fever is sick!

2
Cheesepopel 2 points ago +2 / -0

why would any American man rape children to death in Vietnam> shitloads of them did.

2
January22nd2022 2 points ago +2 / -0

Reprobacy didn't start with SJWs. It was widespread even then.

Remember that in then only recent memory, the crimes of "civil right" desegregation had already been forced upon the South, the Hart-Celler act already successfully passed too.

That's why I laugh, contemptuously, at "the lack of Christian values" boomer point, majority was nominally Christian then and when FDR, Woodrow Wilson got re-elected too. They are not Christian Identity types.

If people saw it the way of Lincoln Rockwell William Pierce, Emily Youcis and Adolf Hitler on the other hand... -D

2
Coolgenner 2 points ago +3 / -1

Some of them are hot, you can’t deny that.

1
when_we_win_remember 1 point ago +1 / -0

Opportunism? Any port in a storm? General lack of self control?

1
January22nd2022 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sex with donkeys, goats and camels and their own children.

That should tell you of the kind of outlook they have.

1
January22nd2022 1 point ago +1 / -0

Heavily intoxicated kebab.

11
fuckyoupelosi 11 points ago +11 / -0

Oy vey very antisemitic these semites are!

9
WhatWouldMountainDew 9 points ago +9 / -0

Article from NYT circa 2004

https://archive.ph/yLj6d

3
systemthrowaway 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wonder if they still use the term today lol

7
Unnotable 7 points ago +7 / -0

Pretty accurate and fitting

7
SicilianOmega 7 points ago +7 / -0

The Jews? That's like calling the Vietcong "the Vietcong."

5
diogenesofthearch 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hey, Pelley. It's not just because of the "distrust".

4
DR38 4 points ago +4 / -0

The Nose is great, I bet some of us know of each other on Gab by other names.

2
Hyperborean_ [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's definitely one of the better follows in the Gab community, has a lot of good original content.

4
lariloles 4 points ago +4 / -0

well, it's true. they are jewish soldiers.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Kekistan_United 3 points ago +3 / -0

the arabic world has a longer written-and-taught history about jews than any other...

and since the jews couldnt convince the darkies, they moved back onto the whites.

lol

japan has 'demons' in their historic pictographs of long-nosed
people wearing phylactories on their heads.

all of history has known, since forever.

3
PleaseFaceWall 3 points ago +3 / -0

So we were...wolves...in jew clothing?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
PleaseFaceWall 1 point ago +1 / -0

pAtRiOts

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
You_Are_Based 1 point ago +1 / -0

WUZ

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
boxofficepoison 3 points ago +3 / -0

That’s a little too on the nose

3
Medicnz3 3 points ago +3 / -0

Based

2
AntsCamera 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some if not most of them deserved every bullet they got. There is alot of fucking easy talk around here, muslim apologists and anarchists.We regret nothing.

5
80960KA 5 points ago +5 / -0

Muzzies aren't a problem if they're not let into our nations. Instead we bombed their nations and accepted their "refugees".

-7
covok48 -7 points ago +3 / -10

I don’t care what those worthless fucks think of us.

19
Hyperborean_ [S] 19 points ago +19 / -0

I'm not saying you should care, but their perception of the situation is not wrong. At this point the U.S. military (at least the units in the Middle East) is nothing more than a proxy force for Israel, which has led to the unnecessary death of thousands of our young men.

15
Telia 15 points ago +15 / -0

What i hate the most is cuckservatives constantly falling for zionist propaganda and cheering this on. Not realizing they are cheering for the worst enemy that wants to enslave the world .

4
unplugger3214 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wonder if Muslims and Muslim nations would be much more tolerable on this Earth if we nuked Israel and did an actual world wide Shoah, then deport most of the Muslim migrants from America and Europe back to where they came from, get out of fucking with Middle East affairs and keep Muslims in their own countries.

6
unplugger3214 6 points ago +6 / -0

Actually check that, I want to invade and annihilate Turkey and take Constantinople back, it was our city first. The Ottomans were kind of scumbags that kept trying to invade Europe for centuries.

3
systemthrowaway 3 points ago +3 / -0

Muh only democracy in the middle east

3
WhatWouldMountainDew 3 points ago +3 / -0

One of my proto red pills was watching Lawrence of Arabia for the first time. This was in the earl-mid 2000's when "spreading democracy" was the primary directive for the US military.

I don't know how much of the movie is fact or fiction, but the thing that came across very clearly is that there are very real cultural differences between the sensibilities between White ethnicities and Semitic (middle eastern) sensibilities.

You can spread democracy all you want but if that democracy is contrary to the fundamental nature of the people you are spreading it to, that democracy won't take root.

4
superspathi 4 points ago +4 / -0

Democracy is gay. Monarchy and empire is the way to go. Get some pride back.

1
when_we_win_remember 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess they fall for propaganda, sure, but they pretty openly suck Israel's nuts, too. You tell a cuckservative "we're going to war to protect Israel," and they'll ask "where can I sign someone else up?"

4
covok48 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is true.

1
MrLammi77 1 point ago +1 / -0

at least in the middle East

That's what they are everywhere now. The US military promotes nothing but faggotry these days.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0