229
Comments (62)
sorted by:
37
ItCameOutOfACan 37 points ago +37 / -0

History is a pack of lies about events that never happened told by people who weren't there.

George Santayana

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
23
covok48 23 points ago +23 / -0

There’s “all the so called death camps were in the non-Western Allied occupied sectors” accurate & verifiable, yet suppressed history.

Then there’s the “Mansa Musa’s oversupply of gold ruined the Roman Empire through inflation” history gem I read here last week. Whereas he lived 1000 years after the fall of the empire, Roman inflation was cause by the debasement (taking gold out of) the currency, and that an infusion of foreign gold would have stabilized the empire by keeping the wheels of government going.

Questioning history is not a license to make up any faintly historical bullshit because the narrative sounds better to you. You have to actually prove it.

4
gragas17 4 points ago +4 / -0

I assumed the person who wrote that was talking about the Byzantine Empire? and for that im pretty sure musa's gift giving mainly affected the islamic world

3
Codreanu 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Byzantine Empire as a political entity was the direct continuation of the Eastern Roman Empire, at the very least until 1204 and the Fourth Crusade. 1453 if you count the restored Empire under the Palaeologi.

Byzantine Greeks, though they remained keenly aware of their ancient Greek heritage, called and regarded themselves as Romans, having embraced their Roman citizenship over many centuries of (OG) Roman occupation. Whether they "count" as true Romans has been a hotly debated issue since Charlemagne's days. In any case, it was a state that inherited the Roman Empire, perpetuated its legacy, and called itself Roman.

4
SovereignX 4 points ago +4 / -0

They weren't Roman. Romans can only be Italics, from Italy, speaking Latin.

Greeks of any flavor cannot be Roman, in the same way the Kievan Rus ("Third Rome") or the Sultan calls himself "The Sultan of Rome."

2
ItCameOutOfACan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Reminds me of Israel.

"We are totally Jews and have a right to this land"

1
Codreanu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, that's one hell of a topic and one that has been disputed ad nauseam by people far more knowledgeable than me, so I'm not looking to get into that argument. But, the point is, again, as a political entity, if only purely as a state, Byzantium was, in fact, the continuation of the Eastern Roman Empire, not a foreign power posing as a new Rome. There was no interruption between Roman and Byzantine institutions, or usurpation of the former by the latter - one evolved into the other. And Greeks had been Roman citizens since long before the Empire began to lose its Latin character.

Now Cato the Elder would agree with you, Caesar might not, Marcus Aurelius would probably not - Justinian would ask you wtf you're going on about. The meaning of "romanness" varied wildly over the centuries, and quickly lost a concrete ethnic connotation as the Republic expanded, and especially under the Empire - after all, as late as the turn of the first century BC they wouldn't even give equal rights to other Italians, then a bit over a century later Claudius let Gauls into the Senate. So by the time Caracalla, a swarthy man of Punic/Berber descent, gave Roman citizenship to all free men in the Empire, Latin-speakers or not, that weren't already citizens - what, if anything, was a Roman ? It's not nearly as clear-cut an issue as you make it seem.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
2
Earendil_the_Mariner 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be frank, there is more evidence of "whites" having spread around the world in ancient times than anyone else, besides some Africans going to Sri Lanka (and mainland, see Negritos) and some Asians hitting up some volcanic islands.

However, the "white" race has been seen and recorded nearly everywhere.

Fuck you, mate.

The Jews declared war first.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
Earendil_the_Mariner 3 points ago +3 / -0

"originally white" and "explored the world before anyone else" ... I didn't say any of that.

Shove your agenda up your ass.

Do you believe in the Out of Africa idea?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Earendil_the_Mariner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your entire reply was "I don't know anything, so I'll just trust the (((experts))), faggot!"

Literally, you said nothing else.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
ItCameOutOfACan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus was white. The people that live there now, migrated.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ItCameOutOfACan 1 point ago +1 / -0

See?

No.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
1
ItCameOutOfACan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wrong.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
8
MyPCBecameSelfAware 8 points ago +8 / -0

This has been the biggest red pill for me. Realizing that everything fed to the public over the last 10 years is complete bullshit, it's made me reconsider my understanding of the entire world and history. I question everything I've ever read or been told now. I hate that.

7
AlwysHideUrPowerLevl 7 points ago +10 / -3

HISTORY as we know it is fake.

We live in the ruins of the 1000 year Kingdom of Christ as described in Revelation.

The "enlightenment" was luciferian, Lucifer calls himself the light-bearer after all.

Up to 1000 years has been added to the calendar to deceive people. Look at very old grave stones, the year will be written with a J instead of a 1. E.g. it will say J600 instead of 1600. This is because it means in the year of Jesus 600. AD (anno domini) is simply the Latin version of this phrase.

Technology was far more advanced in the past than is generally acknowledged.

MIddle Ages (reign of Christ) was a time of great prosperity, "Dark Ages" are propaganda".

Revelation is real, we are halfway thru it already, at the time where Christ left Earth and the Demons must be let out.

The Civil War was fake. Not that there wasn't a war, but that the causes and events of the war as described today, are so manufactured, so far removed from what actually happened, that the version of the "Civil War" story as told today may very well be fake.

The environment and biosphere were significantly different in the past, with more oxygen and water in the atmosphere. This is why giants existed in the past but don't exist anymore, there isn't enough oxygen to support enormous sized people.

White People are the 10 Lost Tribes of Israel. The Khazars are satan worshipping imposters from Eastern Europe.

The Rapture already happened, the dissapearance of all census records in the 1890s combined with the massive orphan trains are clues of this.

The real Holocaust was the World Wars, a mass culling of whites followed by the mass reduction of Europe's political power.

Hitler was possibly trying to restore the 1000 year kingdom of Christ, as evidenced with his "1000 year Reich" rhetoric.

Zionist Occupation Gov't is real and the root of all conspiracies. Although I don't think I need to explain this last one to ConsumeProduct.

2
Zogdanov 2 points ago +2 / -0

got any more knowledge drops good sir?

2
AlwysHideUrPowerLevl 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yes

The Western Roman Empire never ended. It simply evolved into the Roman Catholic Church. Think about it - The Jews’ religion is centered on Jerusalem, since that is the center of their historical and cultural roots. The Muslim’s religion is centered on Mecca, for the same reason. The Catholic’s religion is not centered on Judea or galilee, where Jesus taught- it is centered on Rome, as Rome was the center of the Roman Empire that became the Catholic Church.

Lord of the Rings is based on real ancient history. Tolkien was part of occult circles at Cambridge that studied ancient texts and practiced remote viewing. CS Lewis was in similar circles, and Narnia is also (very loosely) based on real events past and future.

At a certain level of advancement, there is no difference between subjects. For example, Philosophy and mathematics are identical in concept, and only differ in the symbols used to express them. Mathematics is simply raw logic applied to relationships between numbers, and the variables that define those relationships. Philosophy is simply raw logic applied to relationships between ideas or factors that, unlike numbers, are too complex to be expressed through a single symbol and must be written out in words. To truly understand philosophy you must understand mathematics, as math is the simplest, purest expression of logic.

Most people have psychic abilities that are intentionally supressed through a combination of polluted environment, processed food, and social conditioning. If you have ever had a dream about the future then you will understand what I mean.

The placebo effect proves that we have the power to heal ourselves through simple belief. These abilities are suppressed the same way our psychic abilities are suppressed.

Reincarnation is real. All the quotes in the Bible about being "born again" are not metaphors- they are literal.

There is one thing in my mind that proves gnosticism is correct. All living things must kill other living things to survive. Plants are alive, they are murdered by animals who in turn are murdered by other animals or by humans to stay alive. A loving God would never create a world in which the living could only survive through murder.

Chris Chan is 100% right about the Dimensional Merge (dimensions coming together) which explains the Mandela effect and mass false memories. He can't explain it properly because he is a cartoon obsessed schizo motherfucking retard. This is caused by CERN, beginning in 2012. CERN just restarted in 2022 so prepare for more bullshit.

On the subject of Schizos: many are actually very smart people that are hyperaware of patterns which enables them to figure things out. In many cases Schizos become insane because they identify basic contradictions in reality that they cannot explain. Due to seeing far beyond what normies see, they cannot properly articulate their findings.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

At a certain level of advancement, there is no difference between subjects

As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...

a) form represents the subject within the objectifying flow.

b) the velocity of flow causes momentum (level) for the resisting form within.

c) same flow self differentiates into form (choice) through momentum (balance).

d) ADVANCE (being moved forwards) MENT (mind; memory) aka action to reaction; object to subject; balance to choice; flow to form; perceivable to perceiving.

e) compounding the subjects is what the parasitic few are suggesting; hence mixing the ignorant many together as to destroy perceivable differences (inspiration). The few use the suggested term "unity" ; while the many ignore U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness". Not togetherness; but differentiation.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
2
KingSweyn 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's sniffing his own farts.

They are complex geometric intrarelated farts, but when he talks about them he's stuck "in the air" and doesn't connect heaven with Earth.

I mean it's all good to become enraptured by your own conception of the deeper, more fundamental layers of reality, but a true philosopher connects it back to the gross expression of the material, the realm of animals and percussion.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

do you ever comment anything even remotely related to what you're replying to?

Replying represents answering a suggested question. I struggle to resist that temptation by adapting to perceived inspiration instead. The more one adapts to perceived inspiration; the more one grows comprehension thereof. If I would fall for the temptation of suggested information; I would be stuck with the majority reasoning about the meaning of suggested words.

As for remote...RE (response) MOTE (meeting) ignores that every perceivable difference coexists within the same reality. We don't need to meet; since we already share a foundation; hence RELA'TE, verb transitive [Latin relatus, refero; re and fero, to produce.] implying NATURE, noun [Latin from nature born, produced].

To be implies out of; hence produced by, and therefore in response to...which is what I'm doing by adaptation to perceived inspiration.

i literally have no idea what you're saying

a) NO (nothing) IDEA (Greek; to see). Theses words were suggested to you; so that you contradict yourself whenever using them. Seeing nothing implies ignoring perception of everything.

b) LITERAL (according to the letter) represents suggested information; written down. That's what you try to adapt to; try to understand (standing under); yet what the words used describe isn't about the suggested information; but about perceived inspiration.

I like to use this example to point out the difference...suggested information..."insane person" and perceived inspiration..."in-sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by and therefore out of and in response to sound.

The parasites did the same trick with human and animal aka HUMAN; noun (hebrew; form) + ANIMAL, noun (Latin anima; air; breathe; soul)...an allegory for form (life) animated by flow (inception towards death). The many are tricked to reason about what's a human or animal; while they ignore to represent ANIMAL (animated) HUMANS (forms).

c) ask yourself if you have self discernment? Can you with as little words as possible describe who; where; what and why you are?

maybe im too small minded to "get it"

a) being able to perceive implies being ONE perceiving within ALL perceivable...so you already got access to everything, and what you lack is comprehension about what it means. This comprehension has to be grown by your choice. You right now represent ONE seed within the soil of ALL, and you're being deceived to ignore growing.

b) small implies versus big; a rebranding of want (big) vs not want (small) reasoning; caused by your consent to a suggestion (measuring minds aka IQ)

b) MIND (Latin mens; Greek. memory) represents a response to incoming (perceived inspiration); yet allows your choice to ignore it for suggested information by others. For example...you perceived sound; while others suggest you words; shaped out of perceived sound. Those words tempt you with attached meaning (fiction) to ignore the perceived meaning (reality).

A cow isn't a cow...you just consent to a suggested label; brand; idolized meaning (cow) for what you're perceiving. The "cow" doesn't require the label to exist; neither does anything else perceivable. The parasitic few fill the minds of the ignorant many with suggested information by tricking them to label everything aka to slap affixed brands on a moving system. That corrupts memory and comprehension of perceived; hence self imposed restrictions upon growth; hence feeling small-minded; when interacting with a less restricted mind.

1
QuaratinedAnon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Reincarnation is real. All the quotes in the Bible about being "born again" are not metaphors- they are literal.

This contradicts a lot of what is taught by the Church and written in the Bible about the afterlife.

There is one thing in my mind that proves gnosticism is correct. All living things must kill other living things to survive. Plants are alive, they are murdered by animals who in turn are murdered by other animals or by humans to stay alive. A loving God would never create a world in which the living could only survive through murder.

We live in a fallen world. God's creatures lived in harmony in paradise.

0
Earendil_the_Mariner 0 points ago +0 / -0

Fuck the church, it deserves to be forgotten.

What translation of the Bible do you read?

1
Thecryptoclub 1 point ago +1 / -0

KJV-er detected

0
Earendil_the_Mariner 0 points ago +0 / -0

Lol, the opposite.

Book of Deer all the way.

1
Thecryptoclub 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would like to know more

1
QuaratinedAnon 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, Jesus gave us the Church. The Bible says that Christ is the head of the Church. I read KJV and NKJV.

0
Earendil_the_Mariner 0 points ago +0 / -0

Oh, it makes sense then.

You should read older versions preferably in Greek, and cross-reference them with other newer versions.

2
VicariousJambi 2 points ago +2 / -0

White People are the 10 Lost Tribes of Israel. The Khazars are satan worshipping imposters from Eastern Europe.

This is one that I've been mulling over for a while now. I'm not sure if I agree that the white people were the "real" jews. My current belief is that when Jesus came around to tell the jews to stop being satanic that they kvetched so hard they added their jewish satanism, the Old testament, to the "new" testament, Jesus's teachings. In my opinion they did this to pollute the purely good message of Jesus's teachings and to normalize their satanism, the old testament.

Two main things lead me to this conclusion

Genesis 17 the chapter that describes the covenant of circumcision. As described it is literally a contract with satan calling himself God, or the jews calling him God. If you actual look up the definition of what a covenant is, its a binding agreement. Nowadays that would be called a contractual agreement. The terms are that the jews will be granted power and prosperity in exchange for the genital mutilation of themselves and their newborn babies. I don't think the actual God would want you to cut his fresh new creation. I don't think he'd want you to cut up newborn baby penis. Thats satanic blood ritual disguised as virtue. The ultimate subversions are always supreme evil pretending to be supreme good and getting away with it.

The first guy that compiled the Bible didn't attach the Old testament to it, and omitted a lot of what is considered part of the canon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcionism

This would explain why the jews and the rest of the masons for vehemently despise Christianity. Christians worship the one all powerful God, one more powerful than theirs. Everything is a hierarchical power structure to them.

They know God exists and are attempting to usurp him and claim his throne by controlling all things. They want to control every aspect of his creation in order to become him. All of these conspiracy theories, the all seem to have the same end, to make the cabal God and give the cabal Gods attributes. All they can mange is one big house of lies. They are worshiped through their idols, their superstars. They have the destructive capabilities of God through their lie about having nuclear arms capable of blowing up continents. They can control the weather. They control the operation of groups of people through their control of the government, money and corporations. They control the land under your feet, they control what you think the the very shape of the Earth is.

What we are seeing going on right now with the internet, with covid, with communism, is them taking further control. They control humanity as a group, but they have yet to control us as individuals. Their current goals are controlling down to an individual level.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +2 / -1

HISTORY as we know it is fake

His-story represents suggested information; which when consented to, ignores perceived (to know; knowledge) inspiration. Those who choose to ignore need (perceived) for want (suggested), find themselves within a want (real) vs not want (fake) conflict of reason. The parasitic few use suggestion to divide the consenting many into reasoning against each other over suggested information; while being racketeered for their ignorance of perceived inspiration.

middle ages; dark ages

Middle represents allegory for choice at the center of perceived balance (need/want); while light and dark represent allegory for comprehension (perceived) or ignorance (suggested).

Technology was far more advanced

Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents temporary resistance within ongoing velocity; hence balancing as choice while being advanced. Suggested TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Gr. art, and word or discourse.] is used to tempt one to ignore being the resistance out of the natural for instead following the advancement of the artificial towards death.

The comprehension of those within the advancing system was once grown more efficiently; while now suggested technology is used to tempt the consenting users to ignore their own growth. Smartphone users behave akin to McD cashiers aka pressing this picture to get that confirmation ad infinitum.

more oxygen

OXY (acid) GEN (generation aka generated by action). Everyone perceiving represents a "reaction" to everything perceivable "enacted" upon them. To be (form) implies out of (flow); hence in response to. Form represents different reactors within the same flow generator. Less and more tempts to ignore being differentiated (form) out of same (flow) aka an ingredient transmuted out of base (alchemy).

1
KingSweyn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lucifer calls himself the light-bearer after all.

Lucifer was the "morning star", and an ancient name for the planet Venus. You know, back when folks commonly thought that "wandering stars" were deities.

It's not the Synagogue of "Satan", it's the Synagogue of Saturn. The Star of David was originally the star of Remphan, a demon-summoning circle for the deity of Saturn. Moloch is yet another name for Saturn. Child sacrifice has been associated with this planet since old Canaan. Even the Greeks had Kronos (Saturn again) eating his own child.

The character of Satan predates any Christian conceptions of him... And Christianity puts tons more attention on him than the Bible does, because he's not a biblical personality. He's been adopted into the doctrine and conflated with Venus.

Similarly, the story of Christ is littered with Sun-God memes. "The light of the world", halos, and the 3-day resurrection which is a reference to the winter solstice dating back to the Pharaohs.

2
dajork 2 points ago +2 / -0

if you look at the history of WHAT saturn is - traditionally known as the Greater Malefic - it really does add up. the ancients claim that saturn is, quite literally, the author of lies, horrible mischief, occultism, and chief corruptor of the good. so yeah, we are dealing with saturn worshippers.

even more interesting is that the title “satan” means “opposer”, right? so if you look at the signs, saturn’s signs directly oppose the sun’s and moon’s signs. i mean, if we want to get even more obvious, aquarius is identified as quite literally “the sign of satan” because it opposes the sun’s.

6
SuspendBeforeYouBan 6 points ago +9 / -3

I always bring up the holocaust to unvaccinated people that understand the covid-19 situation. It usually goes something like this:

  • Me: The holocaust never happened.
  • Unvaccinated woman who thinks she knows everything: WTF, how could you say that. it is 100% factual that the holocaust happened.
  • Me: It is 100% factual that covid-19 is a dangerous virus, that shutdowns saved lives, the actions of the government saved lives and that vaccines saved lives. In fact I do believe the vaccines and lockdowns saved 6 million lives.
  • Woman: What are you talking about?
  • Me: Ugh... I wish you had a few higher IQ points... explains like she's 5
  • Her: They aren't the same. The facts show covid-19 wasn't harmful and that the vaccine doesn't work. The facts show the holocaust happened!
  • Me: What facts showed the holocaust happened? You mean like news articles? Like what official "establishments" reported? Show me actual facts. And what do you mean covid and vaccines did those things. All the western governments disagree with you, the WHO disagrees with you, the news articles disagree with you, here's some judges disagreeing with you. Clearly the facts show you're wrong. In 100 years from now, do you really think people reading history will accept your version of events? Anyone who denies covid-19 as being a deadly virus the world barely survived due to the unprecedented action they took will be branded a covid-19 denier and a person just like you will be telling someone just like me that the facts prove covid-19 happened the way the governments told us it did with undeniable proof.
  • Her: No, you're wrong, it's not the same.
  • Me: So anyway... can you suck my dick?
7
Zogdanov 7 points ago +7 / -0

the secret is to show it out of a jew's mouth e.g. Rabbi Yaron Reuven. You can tell her it's the jews but she won't listen until a jew says it's the jews.

2
BigBadBrutus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wait, what?

1
covok48 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ll take conversations that never happened for $400 Alex.

0
SuspendBeforeYouBan 0 points ago +1 / -1

Happened except the last line

2
Hillary_is_Satan 2 points ago +2 / -0

When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

Ftfy

1
KingSweyn 1 point ago +1 / -0

David Lane's Precept #6/88

History, both secular and religious, is a fable conceived in self-serving deceit and promulgated by those who perceive benefits.

If you know history is fake, imagine how fake your religion is.

1
GoyWhoKnows 1 point ago +1 / -0

post this to boomers.win and see how they seethe

1
BlueDrache 1 point ago +1 / -0

"History is a fable agreed apon" ~ Napoleon.

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

agreed upon

Aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; as the inversion of perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.

1
Velvetmerlin69 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, this place is full of flat earth retards now?

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
Smokratez 0 points ago +3 / -3

Yeah, one of the biggest lies is life being billions of years old, instead of only thousands.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

one of the biggest lies is life being billions of years old, instead of only thousands.

Suggested "thousands" and "billions" implies what? Consent to count as ONE within ALL. What is it that ONE can count? Other ONEs. NUMBER; noun - "the designation of a unit". That already happened...from the collective ALL into each individual ONE within.

Two doesn't represent a perceivable state within nature; all numbers are suggested to deceive the ONE to count. Sleight of hand (sesame street)...The Count: "Would you like to count with me?" Furthermore; all mathematical problems are based on the suggested "0" (nothing) over the perceived "1" (everything). The suggested zero represents an affixed balance to count up and down from; which ignores being the responding choice within the perceived ongoing balance (momentum of motion).

The parasites suggest an affixed balance (0) to tempt the many to ignore the moving system (1); hence causing suggested problems; while ignoring that flow represents the solution for every form within.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1