63
posted ago by AlwysHideUrPowerLevl ago by AlwysHideUrPowerLevl +69 / -6

"removing 80% of the nerves in the penis and destroying the penis' ability to self lubricate has zero effect on sensitivity, and anyone saying otherwise is wrong"

People actually try to claim that, at that point its just cope/denial

"removing the foreskin makes the penis cleaner and leads to lower rates of STDs"

Sure and I bet removing all your teeth would make your mouth cleaner and lead to a lower rate of cavities too?

Come to think of it, you wouldn't have to worry about a stuffy nose or sinus infections if you just cut off your nose too.

And while we're at it, you wouldn't have to worry about athlete's foot if you just removed your feet.

Let's chop off every single body part that has the slightest chance of causing a problem, right goys?

"Removing the foreskin makes it look better"

Totally subjective, and not a good reason to destroy half the natural function of the dick

Circumcision, (especially infant circumcision) should be banned, its disgusting and there's no reason for it to exist.

Comments (121)
sorted by:
18
VicariousJambi 18 points ago +19 / -1

Circumcision is a blood contract with satan pretending to be God, because people are too fucking retarded to tell the difference between good and evil. Just call yourself God and that makes cutting up newborn penis ok!

With this blood contract Satan gets you to corrupt yourself and your children by cutting up baby penis for power and prosperity in return. Those are literally the terms. Don't believe me? Go read genesis 17 again and note all of the times it mentions its for health reasons like the jews try to get you to believe. Maybe look up the actual definition of what a covenant is, too. Hint: its a binding agreement -> a contract.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/covenant

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%2017&version=KJV

5
voyager14 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm Christian and was circumcised as an infant (not for religious reasons). I won't circumcise my future children. Though I'm not convinced it's a satanic ritual (or rather, that it was always a satanic ritual), I do know Romans very clearly teaches a spiritual circumcision of the heart, not the flesh.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
4
Siegfried 4 points ago +5 / -1

The kike u/AngelofDeathToo is obviously JIDF, they already admitted they follow all of the old testament kosher laws and refer to god as Yahweh

They are trying to claim this is a white person.

The most important thing to Jews is mutilation of the genitals of babies. Anyone on these forums that is steadfast in their defense of it is clearly a kike.

2
deleted 2 points ago +7 / -5
5
VicariousJambi 5 points ago +7 / -2

Ok so are you saying the entirity of the old testament is based on a satanic blood ritual?

Yes, I am saying the entirety of the Old Testament is satanic tricks.

Do you call youself a Christian?

I don't exactly call myself anything. I try to follow the teachings of Jesus.

How does this correlate with the new testament?

I think that when Jesus came around and told the jews to stop being satanic they kveteched so hard they attached their satanic old testament in order to (A) Dilute the good message of Jesus (B) Hide their satanic nature (shapeshift)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcionism

http://www.marcionite-scripture.info/Marcionite_Bible.htm

What religion was Jesus a part of? Wouldnt he have been someone who worshipped the "same" God as the old testament, Yahweh?

Religion? Does Jesus need to be part of a religion? He was sent down by God to spread his message.

Wouldnt he have been someone who worshipped the "same" God as the old testament, Yahweh?

Does the Old testament God and the New Testament God seem like the same God to you? Do they act in the same way, have the same set of morals, etc?

Personally, I think not.

Doesnt that make Christianity an extension of satanism then?

I think that modern day Christianity is the same thing that always happens to whites. Mostly good people and good intentioned people being tricked by evil.

3
KingSweyn 3 points ago +4 / -1

Does the Old testament God and the New Testament God seem like the same God to you?

Not in the slightest, but recognizing this obvious truth is one of the classic heresies.

3
VicariousJambi 3 points ago +3 / -0

he's a heretic!

he's a racist!

he's a nazi!

Same playbook, same people

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
VicariousJambi 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which God?

There is only the one, and many pretenders.

Because if Im not mistaken, youre implying that he was sent down by the same "God" as in the old testament, and that would mean, according to you, he was sent by satan.

No, I am not trying to imply that Jesus was sent down by satan. I'm trying to say that much, if not all, of the Old Testament is just satanic tricks masking itself as good.

(because that was the scripture he followed)

Was that the scripture he personally followed, or did he walk his own path? I think Jesus was sent by the "actual" God, not the one pretending to be satan and that he was using the popular "religion" at the time to better communicate to the people of that time the message of God and how goodness had been perverted and subverted.

But beyond that- youre still implying that you worship a man ("Jesus"), and not God.

Following Jesus doesn't mean worshipping him specifically. Even so, I believe he was the direct incarnation of God anyways so I wouldn't have a real problem with worshipping Jesus. I personally follow Jesus and worship God above all.

Because the God Jesus believed in, according to your own words, was satan.

Only if you attach the Old Testament to the Bible, which I believe is satanic subversion.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
VicariousJambi 3 points ago +3 / -0

Those implications are your own. I believe Jesus was sent by God to the people being tricked by satan on purpose, to help them out.

Also I notice how every time I have one of these conversations about how cutting up newborn baby penis for power and prosperity is immoral and satanic the conversation always abruptly moves as far away as possible from something so obviously concretely evil and always just happens to go into the more abstract, personal opinion topics as well.

Just an interesting pattern I've noticed.

Edit: Also, looks like you didn't bother to actually look into Marcionism either. Here's the link again for an overview. It probably answers most of your questions anyways.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcionism

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
Siegfried 1 point ago +3 / -2

Jews added the old testament to the Bible

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
2
Siegfried 2 points ago +2 / -0

The OT literally says the first covenant Abraham made requires mutilating the gentials of babies

-1
KingSweyn -1 points ago +2 / -3

The real jewish parts are where Jesus tells you to assist your oppressors in oppressing you, and loan money to your enemies without expecting it returned.

Jewish ruling classes have gotten so much mileage out of this, it's pure madness.

0
Smokratez 0 points ago +1 / -1

jews have rewritten the bible to put their shit in there. Christianity is used by jews to turn white people into slaves.

Doesnt that make Christianity an extension of satanism then?

Yeah.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +4 / -6
13
Be4Redemption 13 points ago +13 / -0

The worst part is America is so subconsciously enslaved by this particularly satanic practice that even people who don’t like MGM immediately start doing the “well at least it’s not x!” cope when pressed on the topic, and they obsess over meaningless details when the primary ethics of mutilating a baby shouldn’t even be a controversial discussion. I have to admit this is also one of the things pulling me back from Christianity, yes it is specifically forbidden or at least deemed unnecessary in the NT but aren’t we still worshipping the same god (Father) that commanded this in the first place?

3
VicariousJambi 3 points ago +4 / -1

aren’t we still worshipping the same god (Father) that commanded this in the first place?

Not according to the first guy to compile Jesus's teachings. Try reading on this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcionism

http://www.marcionite-scripture.info/Marcionite_Bible.htm

5
Be4Redemption 5 points ago +5 / -0

Still, a lot of these early teachings that address the few insurmountable issues with biblical canon (as decided by Roman Council of Nicaea, excluding scrolls and books that could’ve fundamentally changed the world as we know it) are gnostic in nature and supposedly heresy. I’m not arguing in bad faith or saying you’re wrong, who knows Marcion’s interpretation may actually be the only one Truth in the world, I’m saying every time I go further down the rabbit hole I’m only led to more overly-complicated bullshit when I’m supposed to be a “real Christian” and treat the Bible as literal word of God. It’s spiritually exhausting.

I said a while back ago on this site that I’ll make a post detailing my questions regarding Christianity so I’ll just stick to finish reading Scripture for now and spare you the essay long replies. But can you really blame LARPagans for sticking with their ethnic gods and calling it a day?

4
VicariousJambi 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well its literally the first guy that compiles Jesus teachings. Calling someone a heretic is just like calling me a nazi now. I don't really care if I get called names, you know. It seems like it makes much more sense to me that they had to do SOMETHING about Jesus's teachings in order to pervert them, they couldn't just let something that good run wild. So they had a council on the best way to pervert it.

But can you really blame LARPagans for sticking with their ethnic gods and calling it a day?

I don't really blame anyone for trying to navigate clown world in the best way they can. At least they're trying to think for themselves.

3
Be4Redemption 3 points ago +3 / -0

Agreed.

8
Siegfried 8 points ago +10 / -2

You can tell who the kikes are on here pretending to be Christian when they defend circumcision and the old testament

Perfect example: u/AngelofDeathToo likes to take a knife to baby penis because he is a kike

Circumcision of babies can kill babies:

http://www.cirp.org/library/complications/williams-kapila/

1
deleted 1 point ago +5 / -4
2
Siegfried 2 points ago +5 / -3

Sepsis can happen from a cut of any size, you retarded kike

6
VicariousJambi 6 points ago +7 / -1

or

Its just a little bit of genital mutilation, goyim!!!

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
2
10Inchfishstick 2 points ago +2 / -0

Imagine fighting for the concept of cutting babies genitals...I can't relate, my nose isn't big enough to be able to relate.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
10Inchfishstick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, big nose.

1
Siegfried 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here is a picture of a Jew from 2000 BC

Looks like they were the same big nose, sloping forehead, low big ear abominations we have around today. Makes sense, because they've been inbreeding for since that time. Probably looks just like you, ya retarded pedophile gential mutilating kike faggot.

http://www.cirp.org/library/complications/williams-kapila/

Here's the study done by white people. Circumcision kills babies. Your Talmud admits as much too.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
1
Siegfried 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's in the second link, retard

Now explain why the picture of the Jew from 2000 BC looks like you: a non-white kike with a big nose, sloping forehead, and low ears

8
johnmic07 8 points ago +8 / -0

infant circumcision should be banned in all circumstances. If adults want to do it that's up to them.

8
VicariousJambi 8 points ago +8 / -0

If an adult wants to cut part of their genitals off they should be thrown in an insane asylum or seek psychiatric help.

6
KingSweyn 6 points ago +7 / -1

Correct, there is not a single good argument in favor of circumcision.

If you're defending infant genital mutilation in any context, you're a monster whether you want to admit it or not.

5
NickOrbeck 5 points ago +5 / -0

Never, EVER, google "botched circumcision".

1
TheClintonHitman 1 point ago +1 / -0

John Money Experiment

3
eyespy 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't believe I've ever heard any compelling pro-circumcision arguments. Especially since the STD/health cope no longer holds much water, most pro-circumcision posts either involve:

A) Blatant, often panicked pilpul.

and/or

B)

But it really wasn't that bad, goyim!

3
NiggerPete 3 points ago +3 / -0

The war is won. The young are informed. Only the mentally twisted will destroy their childrens genitals and soon that will be outlawed.

3
hkdlxohk 3 points ago +4 / -1

Even redditors are against circumcision. Shows how wrong it is when it somehow unites us with reddit, and yet a significant portion of America still practices it.

2
Skankblunt42 2 points ago +2 / -0

A girl who I had sex with had only previously had circumcised dicks before, and was amazed and couldn't stop talking about how much better sex with was with my uncircumcised. I could see the instant the light turned on in her head saying, "Ohhh that's what it's supposed to feel like..."

My regards to all circumcised men.

0
Blursed2021 0 points ago +3 / -3

"I'm going to make a post just for drama"

-4
MyDogBlondi -4 points ago +2 / -6

My sister has a friend, an Algerian woman, who was circumcised and supports any daughters she may have of getting circumcised. She says it'll be their choice as it was her choice.

We had a lengthy conversation on the subject, because I was sure she must be crazy. It was interesting to hear that perspective, that gets zero voice in the west.

Basically, it's a rite of passage and it's almost the opposite of being trans. By removing the clitoris, it's like removing a vestigial penis, to make herself exclusively female. Removing the foreskin is akin to removing the labia, making him exclusively male.

They transition from a child with unlimited potential, to making a choice to be a woman/man.

Also, apparently only degenerates don't want circumcision, the clitoris, they claim lends itself to lesbian activity, where she exclusively orgasms from penetration. Meanwhile, the foreskin would assist with anal sex in the pre-astroglide days.

I don't really have much more of an opinion on the subject, but you might find this perspective interesting.

5
AlwysHideUrPowerLevl [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

I can see the logic behind what your Algerian friend says, but I disagree with it. At any rate that's still a perspective I never heard of, so thanks for sharing it.

1
MyDogBlondi 1 point ago +3 / -2

The world is complex. Personally, as a nationalist, I support different peoples and different cultures having wildly different ways of doing things, I think it makes the world a more interesting place.

I just want them to do it their own homelands, not mine.

2
AlwysHideUrPowerLevl [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Very reasonable. Ironically that's a nicer and more "tolerant" worldview than the leftist mindset, where they claim to glorify niceness and tolerance while demanding that everyone has to think the same thoughts and have the same opinions.

0
MyDogBlondi 0 points ago +2 / -2

There's a great comic, about two timelines where a guy travels world. Maybe you've seen it.

Unfortunately I don't have a copy on hand, but in one timeline, he travels to many distinct and unique places, has a great time, and in the end he displays many of the artifacts he acquired on his trip. In the other timeline, it's the same sea of grey buildings and brown people. In the end he says he learned nothing and is hanging a swastika.

That pretty much sums up my world view.

2
Blursed2021 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's the average IQ of Algeria?

0
MyDogBlondi 0 points ago +2 / -2

Since you're apparently too dumb to perform an internet search, Aleriga is ranked 24th in the world in IQ of ~180.

You're attempting to perform something called a "genetic fallacy," where an idea is judged on its origins and not it's merits. You're doing this because you're a low IQ faggot who is incapable of differentiating their own opinion from objective truth and is thus compelled to insert their opinion everywhere as though it were truth.

If you weren't a low IQ faggot, you would have just not found it interesting, realized that no argument was being made, and went on with your day.

2
Blursed2021 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, Algeria has an average iq of 180? Who knew.

-1
MyDogBlondi -1 points ago +1 / -2

Your reading comprehension is about what I expected.

I said "of ~180" not "at ~180".

3
BlokeyMcBlokeFace 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why didn't you say "of ~83" or "at ~83" since 83 is their average IQ?

Stop talking.

-1
MyDogBlondi -1 points ago +1 / -2

Because I'm not your search engine, you stupid faggot.

3
BlokeyMcBlokeFace 3 points ago +3 / -0

Found the algerian.

1
Blursed2021 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please explain it so my little brain can comprehend.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +4 / -9
9
AlwysHideUrPowerLevl [S] 9 points ago +10 / -1

Silence, false prophet of the satanic Demiurge.

You want to talk about "TRAUMA" why not consider the MILLIONS of white babies YOU justify murdering in the womb

I never said such a thing

NEVER FORGET reprobate, the covenants of the Bible are GENETIC COVENANTS to WHITE MEN. What better way to signify that to a population? What better way to ingrain that GENETIC COVENANT YOU WANT TO HIDE than to cut away a skin tag?

If God intended us to be that way, He would have made us that way.

Satan advocates destruction of manhood, including destruction of the male organ itself. Hence why he told everyone to destroy the most sensitive parts of their penis. And that's why Jesus and the Apostles specifically said circumcision wasn't necessary.

But, at least they can't be lead around by some woman just by her touching i

Speak for yourself, coomer

Circumcision make a REAL MAN out of you

Removing half your dick doesn't make you a real man, retard

You want to live like the niggers.

And you want to live like sand niggers

5
Siegfried 5 points ago +5 / -0

He is a hypocrite because circumcision does actually kill babies

http://www.cirp.org/library/complications/williams-kapila/

-1
deleted -1 points ago +4 / -5
6
Siegfried 6 points ago +7 / -1

Sepsis can happen in a cut of any size, you retarded kike

-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
1
Siegfried 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here is a picture of a Jew from 2000 BC

Looks like they were the same big nose, sloping forehead, low big ear abominations we have around today. Makes sense, because they've been inbreeding for since that time. Probably looks just like you, ya retarded pedophile gential mutilating kike faggot.

http://www.cirp.org/library/complications/williams-kapila/

Here's the study done by white people. Circumcision kills babies. Your Talmud admits as much too.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
2
Siegfried 2 points ago +3 / -1

The kike u/AngelofDeathToo is obviously JIDF, they already admitted they follow all of the old testament kosher laws and refer to god as Yahweh

They are trying to claim this is a white person.

The most important thing to Jews is mutilation of the genitals of babies. Anyone on these forums that is steadfast in their defense of it is clearly a kike.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +3 / -5
-2
deleted -2 points ago +4 / -6
6
AlwysHideUrPowerLevl [S] 6 points ago +7 / -1

Half of the surface area and 80% of the nerves.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
4
Siegfried 4 points ago +5 / -1

You want to talk about "TRAUMA" why not consider the MILLIONS of white babies YOU justify murdering in the womb?

Circumcision kills babies too, kike retard

-2
deleted -2 points ago +3 / -5
4
Siegfried 4 points ago +5 / -1

Sepsis can happen from a cut of any size, retarded kike

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
2
Siegfried 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here is a picture of a Jew from 2000 BC

Looks like they were the same big nose, sloping forehead, low big ear abominations we have around today. Makes sense, because they've been inbreeding for since that time. Probably looks just like you, ya retarded pedophile gential mutilating kike faggot.

http://www.cirp.org/library/complications/williams-kapila/

Here's the study done by white people. Circumcision kills babies. Your Talmud admits as much too.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
0
Siegfried 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's in the second link, retard

Now explain why the picture of the Jew from 2000 BC looks like you: a non-white kike with a big nose, sloping forehead, and low ears

-9
deleted -9 points ago +3 / -12
5
AlwysHideUrPowerLevl [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

who do you refer to? Candace owens?

-7
deleted -7 points ago +5 / -12
10
AlwysHideUrPowerLevl [S] 10 points ago +11 / -1

the circumcision stuff is silly. Most cut guys never had a rabbi suck their bloody baby dick. HALF their dick was not removed and they work perfectly fine.

"Oy Vey, you should be grateful we only took half your dick goy! And we sometimes didn't even suck on the other half! All the negative effects are just misinformation lol"

Stop being so worried about other guys dicks

Stop being so worried about people wanting to ban involuntary genital mutilation, rabbi

-4
deleted -4 points ago +2 / -6
6
AlwysHideUrPowerLevl [S] 6 points ago +7 / -1

[bad thing] still exists, therefore we can never ever mention [other bad thing] that also exists

shut up retard

-2
deleted -2 points ago +3 / -5
8
AlwysHideUrPowerLevl [S] 8 points ago +9 / -1

Millions of babies are physically and mentally scarred for life so that rabbis can be perverts and big pharma can profit off selling foreskins, and you're ignoring that because some babies are killed before birth?

2
Siegfried 2 points ago +2 / -0

Like I've already told you, death is a known side effect of circumcision

Galatians 5:2

Listen! I, Paul, tell you that if you start following the law by being circumcised, then Christ cannot help you.

3
Siegfried 3 points ago +4 / -1

Circumcision kills babies, kike retard

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
2
Siegfried 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Talmud tells the Jews they don't have to circumcise if their first son dies from having their genitals mutilated

5
Siegfried 5 points ago +6 / -1

Stop being so worried about other guys dicks.

But you're worried we won't let you take a knife to the penis of a baby

You are a pedophile kike