Comments (29)
sorted by:
thaicooking 46 points ago +46 / -0


That’s not a science though.

caravanofdeath 26 points ago +26 / -0

If a field has a replication crisis, it isn't a science. These replication crises result from deviating from rigorous methodology, and in many cases outright fraud. All of the "soft sciences" including medicine and pharmacology, aren't real sciences.

subbookkeeper 31 points ago +31 / -0

He's right, children need more than a nuclear family.

Lots of siblings, grandparents, Aunts and Uncles, neighbours that they know the names of and solid cultural, social and religious structures around them.

It takes a village to raise a child. A village that has a homogenous culture and values children.

iDinduNuffin 9 points ago +9 / -0

Solid racial structures, homogeneous race

PurestEvil 28 points ago +28 / -0

I'd bet that piece of science shows data that have no implication on the nuclear family. It probably says: "Well, children need a little more than the nuclear family alone can provide." And retard leftists use it to claim how it is "ineffective", which is a stupid argument.

That's like saying food, water, sleep are ineffective in sustaining human life because it lacks activities. Which is pure sophistry.

Electronicscreen0 23 points ago +23 / -0

Fag “families” have higher rates of domestic violence, child abuse and often fail to bond with the kid they adopted. But sure, nuclear families are bad because “muh science”.

ideology 17 points ago +17 / -0

If by ''nuclear family'' they mean a mother and father who are at work 24/7, then they are correct.

ButMyFeelings 6 points ago +7 / -1

Exactly. The nuclear family was great in the 50’s and 60’s, but it should have been plain to see that it would not be sustainable with inflation over time. It was a model that was destined to result in women needing to earn an income in the vast majority of cases.

migger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do you think the Jews taking over the US currency and implementing the Federal Reserve was unavoidable? Was it unavoidable because of Jewish caused wars?

ButMyFeelings 1 point ago +1 / -0

It depends how far back you think you need to look, if you’re trying to decide if it was unavoidable. Hindsight is 20/20 so you could argue all of these events were avoidable if we knew better at the time.

SubtleTea 14 points ago +14 / -0

It takes a village to raise a village idiot.

deleted 13 points ago +14 / -1
zzbg 14 points ago +14 / -0

The entire existance of the human race supports a generational family. Nuclear is an invention of the 1950's.

KingSweyn 10 points ago +10 / -0

Don't listen to thousands upon thousands of years of proven success, let this overbroad interpretation of an irreproducible study from a ((Harvard)) graduate student completely replace your traditional worldview.

I mean, you wouldn't want to look silly in front of reddit now would you?

hello-mayo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yikes! Sweaty, don't you know modernity™ knows best?

Perhaps you need to be reeducated.

zzbg 11 points ago +11 / -0

I mean they aren't wrong though?

The nuclear family is an invention of Hyperindividual Capital.

Generational families are the strongest both at family bonds, social stability, and cultural tradition.

YEETveteran8888 10 points ago +10 / -0

8 kids are better than two.

weebduke 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah faggot.

Go back to making extended enclaves instead of justifying being a virgin funko-collector for life.

exitnightenterlight 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nuclear family in a town you can participate in society without a car: ok

Nuclear family in a concrete suburban wasteland where you can't even bike to school without having child protective services called: not ok

Maybe there is a difference between the nuclear family of yesterday and today.

AutisticShoeshineBoy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Always a genetic dead end male

TendieMan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly, that's why we need the extended family.

derkevevin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your abortions don't count, degenerate filth.

blyat56 2 points ago +2 / -0

Inventing fake science to justify absent fathers because you've given up on the expectation that fathers be there for kids.

thesneederman 2 points ago +2 / -0

he's right to an extent, the nuclear family alone doesn't raise a good child, you need a good and decent community for them too. Still doesn't mean that he isn't retarded

SmellsLikeTelAviv 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree

SmellsLikeTelAviv 2 points ago +2 / -0

Traditional family structure is superior in every way

Captain_Raamsley 1 point ago +1 / -0

It takes two people to raise a child

PonySoldier66 1 point ago +1 / -0

By definition they won't survive

Crockett 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are many influences. Therefore the biggest influence is irrelevant.