22
Comments (50)
sorted by:
6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
5
TallestSkil 5 points ago +5 / -0

Explain how instability is something that micromanagers with no physical strength want, handshake.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
9
TallestSkil 9 points ago +9 / -0

Right, so what are you doing to stop them? Nothing. Because it’s one family at a time, one person at a time, one possession at a time, slowly and inexorably.

They. Don’t. Want. Open. Revolt. They don’t want war.

2
crash7863 2 points ago +2 / -0

They don't want open war, but they're not as intelligent as people think they are either. A few generations ago, the smart ones came up with the plan. They began subverting with intent. They had children, the children were not told the plan, just how to execute it. They keep subverting and fucking things up because that's how it's always been. They gain power through group hiring preference because that how it's always been. Those in power now do not understand the long term goal. That is why you see the economy collapsing.

It's a million million cons all going on at once with none of them thinking the gravy train will ever stop. In their mindset, so long as they can exploit the system, it is good. They do not ever consider that they can destroy the system. They are parasitical.

Jews are incapable of maintaining anything because they are all short sighted thinkers. They will cheat and steal to get ahead, but they will never build.

2
Crockett 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's your deal? I can never tell whether you're trying to defend jews, because "they aren't actually trying to ruin things," or you're trying to rally people to action, because "they're not actually doing anything about it," or if you're just pure dooming, but if in that case, why are you so damn angry about it?

7
TallestSkil 7 points ago +7 / -0

What's your deal?

Crippling depression at the genocide of my people and the eradication of my culture.

"they aren't actually trying to ruin things,”

Where did I say that? I said they don’t want instability. Why would they want to destabilize a system that they already completely control? What part of government do jews not control? If any, where do you see actions being taken to destabilize it? What part of the economy do jews not control? If any, where do you see actions being taken to destabilize it? What part of society do jews not control? If any, where do you see actions being taken to destabilize it?

They’ve already ruined everything. They’ve ruined most things so much that no one–not those of us here, not our parents, not even our grandparents–can remember a time in which certain parts of society were ever outside jewish control. We've have a multi-generational recontextualization of what reality itself actually is, to the point where there are some situations in which there is no one alive who remembers true freedom or the original white man’s law.

or you're trying to rally people to action, because "they're not actually doing anything about it,”

My position on the matter has been the same for many years: Whites can easily fight back and win; we simply won’t.

why are you so damn angry about it?

Genocide wears on a person.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
6
TallestSkil 6 points ago +6 / -0
  1. You didn’t read.
  2. You didn’t answer.
  3. You don’t fucking understand what I said.

Explain why, if jews want civil war, they haven’t caused one in 150 years. Or why they haven’t caused one in any amount of time in the other nations they control.

Guess who’s not going to answer again!

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +4 / -1

Kill yourself. No argument? Kill yourself. No evidence? Kill yourself. Can’t hold a discussion? Kill yourself. You lose. Anyone who isn’t in a coma knows you have lost. There is no war. There is no unrest. There is no uprising. There has not been for 150 years. Jews do not want it. Period. End of story. They know they will lose an actual conflict, so they have desperately kept the white man from fighting back for decades. And so there has been no war for decades, because they control every relevant institution.

You’re clinically insane. You are mentally ill. Your brain is physically damaged. No one with a working mind would ever say the things you are saying. There is nothing happening in the world as described by the OP. The reason for this is the nature of the way that jews behave. You, despite recognizing this nature, do not recognize it as it’s nature, or for what it is.

  1. You aren’t reading the posts. OR
  2. You’re too emotionally invested in your “day of the rope” fantasy to accept the objectively factual contents of the posts. OR
  3. You had no argument when you started and put no thought into the idea in the first place, so anything that was not lockstep agreement with your knee-jerk response has to be combatted to the death to make you look better.

Go on, though. Tell everyone that I’m wrong. Show us all, what’s the “last straw?” How much more can the white man take? What’s the “final step” before “everyone” wakes up and there’s “fighting in the streets”? How much more can they do to us before we totally rise up and definitely do something?

Go on. It’s your claim. Back it up.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Interesting how a two day old handshake knows what I “say to everyone” too, isn’t it. Very interesting.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yes. And now you’ve ruined them both, because we can never trust either again.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Enjoy, sockpuppet.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Micromanagers?

Learn what the Talmud is,

physical strength?

Judaism is “matrilineal” because jewish men are the weakest group on earth. Dying as often as they have in combat throughout the millennia led their leaders to restructure the religion such that the women, taken as bounty by conquerers, would still “pass on” the judaism since the men wouldn’t be around.

You're hilarious.

Yeah, ignorance really is bliss.

How do you think the commies win?

Not through physical strength.

Arm wrestling?

Why would you even suggest then when I said the exact opposite of what you’re claiming, dumb fuck?

Why would jews want to destroy a society that they completely control, dumb fuck?

Why would jews want to make their enemies—enemies physically capable of erasing them from the face of the Earth despite being outnumbered 100:1—more likely, rather than less likely, to fight them, dumb fuck?

Think before posting.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

they don’t completely control society

It’s funny that you call others low IQ.

doesn’t answer the questions

Clockwork.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

You don't understand what it means to completely control something.

I do, and that’s why you fail to combat the jews effectively.

You can buy a gun, you can easily buy the ingredients for most explosives and chemical agents, that's hardly controlled, much less controlled completely.

Interesting. And yet no one uses them. And no one bombs. And no one attacks. And no one resists. Almost as though they’re controlled completely. Because once you’ve enslaved someone’s mind, their body can do nothing but follow.

This group has control of all banking, worldwide. This group controls the court systems of–at the very least–the Western world. They own every media corporation–print, radio, and television. They are responsible for all education systems, from the textbooks behind them to the indoctrination of the professors that teach them, and thus they control the minds of the last three generations, which have been raised on nothing except their propaganda. They also control and direct those other groups–who are not part of them–in many of the deeds they do. They also control, either directly or indirectly, the governments of more than just the Western world. Assuming, of course, you understand what the word ‘control’ means. An example: when the House or Senate of the United States Congress–a body notorious for its partisanship, real and pretend–passes a bill or resolution 435-0 or 100-0 in favor of Israel… several bills and statements, in fact; a whole slew of them… that looks something suspiciously like “total control.

If you psychologically torture someone into killing himself, it can hardly be said you are without guilt. If you do this to three whole generations of people, through media and academia for over 75 years, you are beholden to infinitely more guilt. You did not shoot every member of these generations with bullets, stab them with knives, or even chemically castrate them such that they could not reproduce. But you were the cause of their deaths. Not everyone thinks this way, though. Let’s look at an example. Jewish Talmudic law absolves a jew of murder if he ties a man to a pole–say, in the desert–and leaves him to die of thirst. No, seriously. By jewish law, the jew is “not” guilty of murder, because “the sun killed the man.” Similarly, if ten people have knives and stab a man, but your stab was the seventh and he only died after the tenth, you are “not guilty” of murder. Only the last stab was “responsible” for the death. So says the Talmud. When you are from a culture that has been raised from birth to think this way–for millennia–you will engage in certain behaviors that are detrimental to all those around you. Perhaps without even knowing. But you will still be at fault.

A population can be reduced, through psychological torture, to accept the idea that they should not breed. They can even believe, as a result of this torture, that they are willingly choosing not to reproduce, even though it was only through external forces that this idea was inculcated. This is an idea called Naturalistic Dissociative Disorder. The term refers to the dissociation of an activity from its naturalistic function, which is to pursue the physical stimuli evolved to promote this vital behavior. To clarify, this psychological problem is easy to see in the obese. Someone who is obese has totally dissociated eating from its naturalistic purpose–the need for nutrition. Why do humans have such a refined sense of taste? So that we can discern foods which are viable for ingestion (and which are unhealthy/poisonous/rotten), and so that we are motivated toward consuming said foods. These foods, generally, are needed to power your body as living organism. But what happens if you dissociate taste from nutrition? If a person eats solely to pursue the taste–the sensation, the stimuli–with no concern for the nutritional value, what happens when you bypass the work while still demanding the reward? The answer to come. In other words, what happens if technology allows me to offer you absolutely delicious cardboard–total taste sensation, zero nutrition? We’ve seen this quite clearly: most people will eat the cardboard, love it, and become fat to the point that they are physically crippled. They will then “rationalize” this behavior to themselves and others in any way they can imagine, demanding society go out of its way to accommodate their self-destructive delusions, and to even call them “normal” or “healthy.”

The same problem exists with sex. Western society has dissociated sexual pleasure from reproduction. Rather, society has been psychologically abused–through decades of malicious propaganda–to dissociate sexual pleasure from reproduction. Why does sex feel good? So you’ll do it. The stimuli is evolutionarily designed to motivate you to have sex, so that you will engage in reproduction, so that you make more of yourself–so that your genes survive. What happens when you introduce chemicals and/or prophylactics that allow you to pursue sexual stimuli without the resultant consequential reproduction? What happens when these physical blocks are supported by media and “academic” training, and so convinces you–and your entire culture–that “Sex isn’t about reproduction; it’s about enjoying yourself!”? You get people who don’t reproduce. Moreover, you get mentally damaged individuals who make their specific “flavor” of sexual pursuit–bereft of its naturalistic purpose–into their entire identity. You get a society that uses its media to urge young women to start having sex at 13–just after menarche–and to have sex with as many people as possible from 18-25 to “experiment” (read: “develop further sexual dysfunctions and fetishes”).

Look at economics. Look at advertising. Look at textbooks. Look at the things which go into a manufactured product that are claimed as desires for the product. Look at laws at the federal, state, and local levels. Look at the structure and layout of cities. Look at the social organizations required to advance in business. Look at commonalities among taste in food and drink; in leisure activities of all stripes. Look at the owners of what you see, hear, taste, smell, and touch in the media.

And then tell me they don’t have complete control.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

I guess you're just too low IQ to see options

What’s cute is that you’re ignoring the options I’ve posted because you know they’re legitimate and yet your lack of engagement in them proves me right.

There is nothing about destroying resources required by people's low order needs that indicates a targeted response against a specific demographic.

Isn’t that your claim? Forgive me, maybe something is worded incorrectly here. I’m saying that even if needs are removed there won’t be conflict; are you agreeing or disagreeing?

you're essentially asking "why would people who have been expelled 109 times do something to be expelled??"

No. I’m not even remotely saying that. I’m questioning very specific behaviors, ascribed to these people, which make no sense for them to engage in with regard to their desire to not be expelled.

It’s 1,030, by the way.

6
Fabius 6 points ago +6 / -0

ZOG has created a Golem.

It is completely out of their control now.

6
TallestSkil 6 points ago +6 / -0

No. If they wanted war, they would have caused one decades ago. They absolutely do not want instability.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
TheWestYearZero 3 points ago +3 / -0

They want to reduce consumption in north america. At some point expect rationing. It may begin with power brown outs. It may be rationing via inflation or via lower quality goods or via more electronic goods (like porn).

6
TallestSkil 6 points ago +6 / -0

But that only hurts them. They want nothing more than for consumption to increase. Their entire economic system depends on it.

3
TheWestYearZero 3 points ago +3 / -0

My view is based on the fact that the cheap oil is now gone and that the current economic system is in its last days. The US is being closed down and in particular its overheads are going to be/are being drastically lowered.

Once the US nation is a dead letter, the mining and processing of Canadian and Venezuelan oil sands will be economic (very low overheads) and will be used to resource Asia.

A similar process is now occurring with Australian coal, which is no longer being consumed in Australia but is being shipped to China and India.

This scheme will give them at least another 150 years of the oil and fossil fuel age.

6
TallestSkil 6 points ago +6 / -0

the cheap oil is now gone

You realize they’ve said that for 50 years, right? It’s not true. It’s a lie to get you to fall for their schemes.

the current economic system is in its last days.

There’s no evidence of this, either. I would have said it in 2008, but look how that turned out. And remember the South American crash in the ‘80s? That had more weight than even the subprime crisis. Still here.

This scheme will give them at least another 150 years of the oil and fossil fuel age.

Okay, but how does this result in war? We’ve been perfectly fine with our resources being siphoned off to benefit third worlders for decades already.

2
YouNeedVPN 2 points ago +3 / -1

Impossible to run out of oil. Its a Zog lie that it comes from dinosaurs.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
FortheGenerations 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wouldn't put it past them to do so, however I don't think there really are problems at the shipping ports as has been perpetrated. Big companies are still paying contractors to break ground on future construction projects..

2
RetardMoron 2 points ago +2 / -0

The real question is how are they competent enough to brainwash millions of people and turn them into to slaves but apparently not enough to fake vote counts.

This has nothing to do with this, but some people seem to think they would bother "cheating" in an election when two of their puppets were already installed so that it wouldn't even matter anyways, and that full scale fake elections are impossible even though we are talking about the evil bad guys who were more than enough capable of taking control of the entire planet.

5
TheWestYearZero 5 points ago +5 / -0
  1. The brainwashing has been going on now for 100 years at least, not least tv, movies, newspapers, and schools

  2. it is supported by volumes of laws and legal sanctions

  3. it exploits the natural herd behaviors and submissiveness of humans

  4. it didn't matter that cheating was exposed and proven bcs the training has been so thorough

1
deleteme1234 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sowing pain.

1
niggernigger46575675 1 point ago +1 / -0

break. Then build back batter

1
BlueDrache 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bears ... woods ... shit ... and all that.

1
TheWestYearZero 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. They want you to die, Mr Bond.

1
Crockett 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks like.

1
perpetual_notion 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. I think this is an attempt to gain direct absolute power, and they're gambling on people being too complacent in the 21st century to rebel. They might even win that bet, in most countries.