111
Comments (29)
sorted by:
37
Spoonks [S] 37 points ago +37 / -0

It's not like Norway got rich off oil or something...

14
Lean 14 points ago +14 / -0

Less niggers will want to move there so there's that.

7
aaaarg 7 points ago +7 / -0

They also have fish, a lot of fish. I can see them begging to join the EU, after they have ruined themselves with their leftist political course.

2
Joesf23 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought they were already in the EU? I guess thats why they are the least destroyed nordic nation compared to the other cucked ones.

32
TruthDefenseForce 32 points ago +32 / -0

Saudi Arabia increases their production. The quality of life of Norwegians go down. Some virtue signaling morons feel better about themselves, literally nothing regarding the climate changes.

34
Spoonks [S] 34 points ago +34 / -0

I avoid supporting anyone with a "climate change plan" because "climate change plan" is a Trojan horse for dictating

23
Formerlurker92 23 points ago +23 / -0

And global enslavement

28
Call_Me_Kaiser 28 points ago +28 / -0

Destroying the economy to own the right

10
zzbg 10 points ago +10 / -0

All hail the economy, and the GDP on which it makes it's glorious will heard. Truly nothing else is of more import.

10
Call_Me_Kaiser 10 points ago +10 / -0

Except diversity

22
AntsCamera 22 points ago +22 / -0

Of course it is a bunch of women.

They will never bear the blame of what they do, they will blame the 2 nutless cuck men in the room with them when this goes tits up for them.

3
Steeline2 3 points ago +3 / -0

The prime minister is a man though, our former prime minister was a woman and she was decent

17
TakenusernameA 17 points ago +17 / -0

They want western nations reliant on third world oil baronies. If the west is energy independent, globalism will fail as westerners realize they dont need the rest of the planet. That is the goal of the global warming psyop.

13
AntsCamera 13 points ago +13 / -0

The destruction of the idea of a nation being self reliant, the destruction of national identities.

You notice the First thing Bidens handlers did was make him sign an EO killing a pipeline?

14
MaskConnoisseur2020 14 points ago +14 / -0

Never allow Women into Government.

11
Fabius 11 points ago +11 / -0

Women and Soy.

11
blyat56 11 points ago +11 / -0

Let's destroy the thing that has provided us with, until a couple years ago, the safest and highest standard of living on the entire planet. What could go wrong?

Let Them Eat Woke.

7
TheWestYearZero 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is an attempt to make a virtue of necessity, as if they have a choice about the end of the cheap oil age.

What they are trying to say is ''It isn't that the cheap North Sea oil is gone or that fracking loses money...no, that is not why we are banning, it. We're banning it because we are environmentalists."

But here is the single most important fact to bear in mind whenever you hear this kind of thing:

Between 1920 and 1970, the average price of a barrel of oil was $22 in 2021 inflation-adjusted dollars.

In contrast, today - I just checked - a barrel of WTI is $70. That is more than three times as expensive as it was when our civilization was peaking. In 2008, you may remember, it reached $140 a barrel.

This is a problem in a world where one third of all energy is derived from oil because we can't use $70/barrel oil to maintain a civilization that was built on $22/barrel oil. Some things have to be abandoned. And we are seeing that all around us. Societal breakdown.

Yes, all of the perversities that we are seeing are downstream effects of the end of the cheap oil age.

How can that be? What are the mechanics of this phenomenon? Well, the basic driver has been the debasement of money (and the introduction of mass credit) that began in 1970 and has been since sustained as a way to underwrite demand for the increasingly expensive oil. If they had not expanded the money supply and dropped interest rates to historical lows (and opened China as a deflationary counterbalance to that expansion) then demand for oil would have collapsed, and that would have brought a very much earlier end to the West.

The debasement of money that we have all seen has meant an extraordinary extension of social welfare for a huge array of society's parasites, and you can make your own list here but we can include among the parasites government, "health" , "immigration", "foreign aid", "philanthropy" etc. The money had to be spent but could not be put in the hands of working people because that would have been massively inflationary, so it was put into the hands of politicians who used it to buy politicial support among society's most worthless people and most worthless identity groups.

So this is where we are today. Easy money has mantained the demand for increasingly expensive oil but - as we all know - there are no free lunches and the debasement of the currency always means taking from one group or function and assigning it to another group or function. In the West ath has meant taking from the healthy, productive, prudent and sane and using their money to subsidize politicians, the sick, the indolent, the debased and the lunatic.

And as we can see in the picture above, it has even meant being ruled by women, who typically have no idea of where money comes from but love to be the ones to spend it.

5
SolidSnakeOil 5 points ago +5 / -0

Interesting bit about Norway's oil. The profits from selling it goes into a citizens fund that the government can't touch and can only borrow a tiny fraction of. There have been calls to take, minimally 50% of that money and spend it on various horseshit by, just take a wild guess.

3
HowardRoark 3 points ago +3 / -0

Joos?

1
codreanuAppreciator 1 point ago +1 / -0

I get how oil is important to the Norwegian economy, but I think it would be good for them to look into alternative energy sources like nuclear as well. It should be a smoother transition though that should have started in the 60s-70s with initial research into that stuff and continually r&d.

2
TheWestYearZero 2 points ago +2 / -0

There will be no transition, except to immiseration. The West is being shut down to allow North America to be specialized as a quarry and farm for Asia.

1
codreanuAppreciator 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh I know. I hate sounding like a doomer faggot but the west is currently zogged as can be and for that reason I only have low expectations for the actions of our governments.

1
Steeline2 1 point ago +1 / -0

To give some context. Labour won 25% of the vote while the conservatives won with 20%

The left coalition consists of rødt, socialist left party and greens. The center party is debating wether to join the left or stay neutral. If the center joins they will have a majority in the parliment (100 reps to 68 right wing ones, last one belongs to an independent party)

I doubt they will ban oil production as center still wants to drill for oil and AP needs money to fund all their welfare programs. It will either remain as it is or they will make the oil rigs cleaner, which will increase operational costs

1
phoenix1974 1 point ago +1 / -0

Say hello to your new nuclear reactor. Or possible geothermal.

1
Steeline2 1 point ago +1 / -0

No reactors unfortunately. Just more wind and hydro

1
aaaarg 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, the Norwegians have jerked to the left, a matter of not lagging behind the great example america. I'm afraid it's going to break them sour.

1
aaaarg 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, the Norwegians have jerked to the left, a matter of not lagging behind the great example am*erica. I'm afraid it's going to break them sour.

1
BidenLikesMiners 1 point ago +1 / -0

Youve been posting twice, eh.