211
Comments (133)
sorted by:
63
TallestSkil 63 points ago +64 / -1

Get your fist out of my wallet and into my butt. ~ libertarian proverb

43
deleted 43 points ago +43 / -0
8
marvinthehaggler 8 points ago +8 / -0

And apply the NAP liberally on the insertion.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
14
RightSideFunding 14 points ago +14 / -0

ewwwwww

11
PhosphorescentBantu 11 points ago +11 / -0

Lulz

3
BigOT 3 points ago +4 / -1

didn't Jo say something like "it's not enough to be anti-homophobic, we must be actively gay"..? or was it raycis? can't remember

5
kormonir 5 points ago +5 / -0

"It's not enough to not be racist, we must be anti-racist"

Truly abhorrent quote.

4
Call_Me_Kaiser 4 points ago +4 / -0

We must be anti racist I recommend we abolish the term racist as our first course of action

4
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can't have any racism if we get rid of all the minorities. Just saying.

0
Call_Me_Kaiser 0 points ago +0 / -0

There's only one race, the white race

1
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 1 point ago +1 / -0

A man can dream

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
36
AngeredKabar 36 points ago +36 / -0

"Party of Principal"

Which is why their Presidential candidate praised state sanctioned censorship. It's OK if its a private company that receives public funding and grants paid by tax dollars. That way the government isn't directly implicated, and the LP can grift off of feels of hippy-commies.

24
deleted 24 points ago +24 / -0
7
christianknight 7 points ago +7 / -0

(((JoJo)))

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
BringTheCat789 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's OK if a private company that receives public funding and grants does it. It's not OK for that private company to receive public funding and grants... at all.

Giving the government authority to give our tax dollars to private companies, and then allowing the government to turn around and weaponize that to assume control over private companies, is a deadly mistake. We need to stop it entirely.

The same goes for the federal government to states, and the state governments to localities. The federal government has far to much authority over what states do because they "fund" them.

29
RightSideFunding 29 points ago +29 / -0

SUB verted

There is basically no difference between liberals and libertarians now, except libertarians like guns and supposedly small govt

16
BlueDrache 16 points ago +16 / -0

But vote for larger government to ensure that their liberties are enforced.

4
InfidelCastro11 4 points ago +4 / -0

Liberals no longer exist. They split up years ago. The ones that valued freedom even if they were still cucked in most other ways are now libertarians. The more psychopathic liberals are now blatant communists

1
RetardMoron 1 point ago +1 / -0

They will always be the same as long as they both believe in equality of man

2
RightSideFunding 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ahh, good point.

One could argue that the Left believes in Equality Less than the Libertarian's .. With their whole Intersectionality Caste system

1
lariloles 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was bound to happen since they are hyper-individualistic morons who think that only the economy matters.

1
Maker_Wolf 1 point ago +3 / -2

Bullshit there's no difference. The political compass is the most accurate description imo.

Plus if someone is liberal, but they don't support censorship, and don't support the government controlling our lives, what's so bad about that?

3
MagaMagaChooChoo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Their party does, and they still vote for it. That’s the problem. Liberal fascists can’t hide behind that anymore. I hold the, 100% accountable for everything their vote contributes to.

2
80960KA 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are of course actual libertarians, and ancaps aren't too far off.

But the ""libertarian" party is anything but libertarian these days, they're just democrats but even more gross.

2
Maker_Wolf 2 points ago +2 / -0

I personally think that just because some group has registered themselves as the official libertarian party in the US doesn't mean they get to define libertarianism. I only know one other libertarian besides myself, so I can't really say what "real" libertarians believe, but I just like the basic principal of minimal government.

Also regardless of what definition you're using, I think calling libertarians worse than democrats is a stretch.

1
80960KA 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think calling libertarians worse than democrats is a stretch.

As a class, sure, that would include based ones like the Hoppeans.

I didn't say "libertarians", I said the "libertarian party", and on a sheer retard level, it is worse than democrats. Talking about "liberty" while shilling BLM and gun control...LP can go hang itself like the tranny it is.

1
Maker_Wolf 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok that's a good distinction. Does the libertarian party really support gun control?

24
deleted 24 points ago +24 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
4
lariloles 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's a way to redirect whites who don't like leftism into something else other than pro-white causes.

Whenever whites feel the need to organize themselves, there will always be a cuckservative on one side preaching love and "BASED BLACK MAN" using christianity and on the other side a lolbertarian saying "who cares, man?" or "the individual is what matters" or "the economy is what matters" to deviate whites from pro-white causes.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
6
deleted 6 points ago +9 / -3
1
Blursed2021 1 point ago +2 / -1

A hopelessly naive set of principles that works only with a high trust, homogeneous society that has a strong cultural value for the principles.

2
80960KA 2 points ago +2 / -0

They use it to destroy nations but they also practice it themselves.

They're cultural imperialists, the sodomy empire.

5
Pessimist 5 points ago +6 / -1

Adults have the legal right to mutilate their bodies. I have the legal right to say that it is very stupid to do so. Just because I don’t like something, doesn’t mean it should be illegal.

4
cee8hooz 4 points ago +5 / -1

The problem with libertarianism it is NOT about those liberties US founding fathers wanted. All major libertarian ideologues except Hoppe were JEWS.

Don't understand me wrong : I love freedom unlike those neonazis here. America is founded on fundament of freedom and it is really good. But libertarianism is a lie. Property isn't fundament of liberty - it is part of freedom of person. Axiom of self-ownership is jewish lie,because it claims person can be owned in any form,that ownership is source of all including freedom.It isn't. Freedom is this source of all.

As the result of their actions both nazis,communists and liberals/libertarians create the environment where person becomes slave of big social organisations controlled by jews. And it is obviously not important is you are owned by "company" or "state". No difference.

USA maybe degenerated but it is great country.It have no king,no ruler. At least it shall by its design. It is constitutional republic. Its sovereign is its law,especially its CONSTITUTION and linked to this constitution - BILL OF RIGHTS. It is absolutely fantastic. Your biggest problem is you not execute your law about people who broke their constitutional oaths and usurp power over you,and that you allow to subvert your law to jews and other enemies of your republic.

1
codreanuAppreciator 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're not a libertarian, nazi, or commie, so I am curious what are you? Do you just fall under the big umbrella of the third position, or are you opposed to any form of ideology?

1
cee8hooz 1 point ago +1 / -0

or are you opposed to any form of ideology?

You begin to think for yourself what is good... :)

Well lets say I am against ideologies being under control of jews and satanists what explain those 3 above.

Lets also say that I don't agree with Aleksandr Gelyevich Dugin despite he has a point - not because he is Russian and I am Pole,but because he believe "third"/next "political theory"/ideology shall be mix of compromised ones - liberalism,nazism and communism - don't agree in this sense,that those 3 not only are dead,but also rooting, because "inhaling" even products of their decomposition make people sick,make people crazy. There is idea on which we will rebuild europe.Undiscovered.For sure it isn't any of old ones,despite some parts look like resembling it.

0
Adolf_Kekler 0 points ago +1 / -1

I hate jews, but I love muh freedom! God bless Amerimutts!

But muh constitution!

Truth is more important than freedom, midwit.

https://files.catbox.moe/uii72r.png

1
cutefroggy 1 point ago +1 / -0

The leaders will want to worshipped just like in any government. The most degenerate thing of all is to worship a false god.

1
cee8hooz 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no truth known to man,maybe it is known to God,but you cannot be sure really HE really shares it with you. Errare humanum est.

There can be even no relative/most probable truth without freedom,because only free are free to ask and verify.

All those thing from POL... I wasn't there in those time,but I will tell you something - it was smart lie.

we need to enforce what is right

No.We need to secure our future first and foremost. Saving whole world against their will ? Protect yourself,protect innocents, let idiots pay the cost of their mistakes. Let even them DIE.

freedom destroys us

Whose freedom ? Our freedom or their ?

Why their freedom to be degenerates becomed our problem ? Because we are under attack really. Do those attack is really about freedom or about abusing freedom and taking people's freedom ? Identify your enemy.Unmask your enemy. If unmasking wouldn't work,then next step would be elimination. 1/3 of them are jews but jews are not the only ones who want to make us slaves.

Demoralization, Destabilization, Crisis, Normalization - don't you get it ?

You know what was purpose of indoctrinating you on POL : you might be used for Destabilization and Normalization by the enemy, To build future from your nightmares not from your dreams.

0
Adolf_Kekler 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nice word salad, spastic.

-2
MagaMagaChooChoo -2 points ago +3 / -5

You lost me at “neo Nazis”. Nazis are left wing socialists and the modern Democrat party are Nazis. They want genocide for all white people, Nuremberg laws for white people, support Palestine and hate Israel, hate freedom, want vaccine passports (Papers, please!), want government ownership of business (just like the Nazis) and the list goes on. You have no credibility if you deny history and deny what the Dems are doing today.

1
cee8hooz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do I disagree with you ? No.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
the-new-style 1 point ago +2 / -1

In Libertarianistan, can you sell your children?

What is the penalty for not feeding them, they are imposing their will on the parents after all.

1
cutefroggy 1 point ago +1 / -0

What's the penalty for those things in much of the world? 5000 kids missing. What's the punishment?

1
Adolf_Kekler 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ashamed that the jewish psyop he fell for is now obvious, not because he fell for it

Bu....but it's not true Libertarianism!

Yes retard, it is. Wake up.

https://files.catbox.moe/20qait.png

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
5
PhosphorescentBantu 5 points ago +5 / -0

APPEAL TO SATAN

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
10
PhosphorescentBantu 10 points ago +10 / -0

THAT'S ANTI-SEMITIC

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
cee8hooz 3 points ago +3 / -0

THEN THAT'S GOOD,BECAUSE WE DON'T LIKE SEMITES HERE XD

8
Dr_Science 8 points ago +8 / -0

Let me fix it. Trans people are an attack on Nature and reality. Boys have penises and girls have vaginas. I refuse to live someone else’s mental illness. You are free to declare yourself whatever you want. But society doesn’t have to humor your delusions.

7
CertifiedFaggot42 7 points ago +8 / -1

Are they at the point of advocating affirmation and imposing hate speech fines?

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
4
CertifiedFaggot42 4 points ago +5 / -1

They're imaginary internet points.

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
3
PhosphorescentBantu 3 points ago +4 / -1

ELECTRIC SHEKELS

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
6
cholulaking 6 points ago +6 / -0

Libertarian party is overrun by leftists who think they are libertarians.

5
sn33d 5 points ago +7 / -2

Liberty sucks. COMMUNISTS ARE RIGHT ON ONE THING, THAT PEOPLE AND SOCIETIES WILL DEGENERATE WITHOUT REGULATIONS.

1
lariloles 1 point ago +1 / -0

national socialism says the same thing.

religions say the same thing.

communists didn't find anything new.

of course humans need rules and standards.

all those things that previous generations used to have that contemporary generations deem as "oppressive" were precisely that. rules/guidelines/etc to make sure societies don't degenerate.

5
TruthShark99 5 points ago +5 / -0

Libertarians been breathing their own farts for too long.

4
K98_Mauser_Boi 4 points ago +4 / -0

Literally know some libertarians that share church of satan shit all of the time because of muh abortion rights. And while they say “rights for everyone” they still don’t like Christians and would be fine if you took their rights away.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
lariloles 1 point ago +1 / -0

atheists and commies tend to be like that. attack christians, leave islam and judaism alone.

4
BirchTBarlow 4 points ago +4 / -0

When you're so open-minded that your brain falls out.

3
CheapChinesePlastic 3 points ago +3 / -0

When you stand for nothing, you will fall for anything.

1
lariloles 1 point ago +1 / -0

open to all, loyal to none

3
tbonepickins 3 points ago +3 / -0

The problem with a lot of libertarian thought is that it presupposes an ethnically and culturally homogeneous, morally straight population. In the same way that marxism/Leninism had no way to defend against outside bourgeoisie subversion, libertarianism is unable to defend against (internal or external) subversive elements weaponizing socially degenerate culture against the population.

3
WhatWouldMountainDew 3 points ago +3 / -0

Screw the Libertarian party. What about the rights of those who don't want to go along with the trannies perverted charade?

1
BringTheCat789 1 point ago +1 / -0

We support your rights as well. If you don't want to let trannies in your bathroom, that's your prerogative. If you don't want to let trannies in your business at all, I fully support you.

1
lariloles 1 point ago +1 / -0

what if I don't want non-whites in my business? and in my street? and in my country?

1
BringTheCat789 1 point ago +1 / -0

business

Sure.

my street

If you paid for the street by yourself, then sure. The government should be out of building roads.

My country

For the portion of the country that you own, sure.

1
lariloles 1 point ago +1 / -0

why are whites forced to accept millions of foreigners in their countries under your ideology? can't you see how retarded it is?

0
BringTheCat789 0 points ago +1 / -1

They're not. If they own the land, they are welcome to not accept foreigners. If they don't own the land, then, yes, the foreigners can be there.

1
lariloles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, you're a cuck. Croatia is the land of Croatians. It doesn't have to be written anywhere that "X individuals own the land".

1
BringTheCat789 1 point ago +1 / -0

I actually agree. I believe that European countries should be home of their respective peoples, just like Japan should be land of the Japanese. But I don't think this concept should apply to America, as "American" isn't a nationality you can pair with an ethnicity in that same way. Saying "America should be home to Americans doesn't mean anything.

But, if Germany is home to Germans, etc., it gives whites a place to go if they wish to return to the motherland and live among whites.

3
samsng2 3 points ago +3 / -0

I mean I'm not in favor of trans people but aren't libertarians supposed to let people do their thing even if they disagree with them ? Just a question

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
samsng2 2 points ago +2 / -0

True. Just to have an idea, what do you prefer instead of libertarianism ?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
lariloles 2 points ago +2 / -0

mega arete.

heaven is a kingdom, not a democracy.

2
samsng2 2 points ago +3 / -1

Understandable. As a french I'm not really into monarchy. I'm not at ease with the fact that someone decides everything for my country/personal life until his death. And then to have its next family members to do the same things for my children.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
samsng2 4 points ago +4 / -0

I agree with you. It seems like a show nowadays. To be fair, i've followed your national election and I'm astonished about the fact you use machines to vote. It screams fraud and makes me sad for america.

I just have a different poin of view about this one:

If a specific and definable royal family is ultimately responsible for the state of the nation, then that's a form of accountability that no "democratic" society can mimic.

While I agree about the responsability, I'm kinda afraid they would turn to strong authoritarians if the people disagree with them or ask for more accountalbility. And the people can't really change their monarch unless they "kill him".

But yeah, democracy "is actually just a seasonal rotation of hired hands each extracting personal profit without concern for the overall health of the state."

3
lariloles 3 points ago +3 / -0

democracy was about replacing white monarchy with jewish monarchy.

2
lariloles 2 points ago +2 / -0

one of the first things that happened after the french "revolution" was that jews were allowed back in as full citizens.

1
trumptasticly 1 point ago +1 / -0

The gays and trannies are a smoke screen to distract yall as rich white, chinese and\or jewish people rape our country, commit financial terrorism and kill liberty. Those fags and mental cases would have no control of our culture without the elites boosting there voices. You fell for it and believe the liberty of your neighbor caused this fucked culture. Instead blame ourselves for not having the courage to do what we know our founders would have already done.

1
lariloles 1 point ago +1 / -0

and commies like you who scream "it's the rich's fault" are subverters who want to introduce class warfare in a particular country. you also want to divide people, but instead of being along the lines of pro-this vs pro-that it's along social class lines. communism in eastern europe completely divided entire countries and ethnicities into different groups according social class. instead of thinking as one people started thinking as the rich and the poor. and it was destructive as you know.

1
BringTheCat789 1 point ago +1 / -0

So your problem with freedom is eventually the wrong free people will gain too much power and revoke that freedom, so we shouldn't have freedom in the first place?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
BringTheCat789 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've not experienced that. I'm all for you speaking out against trannies.

2
GenesisFiveTwo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I used to be a libertarian. The globohomo agenda has almost made me a monarchist.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
BigBrassBowls 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m thinking that whole monarchy thing where if the king acts up then the peasants and serfs raid the castle and behead him might’ve been the right way to go about things…

2
JayA88 2 points ago +2 / -0

Weird how “do as thou wilt” is the defining principle of both Satanism and libertarianism.

2
GaiusClaudiusNero 2 points ago +2 / -0

I remember when I used to be a lolbert.

I used to unironcally say that tired old cliche "I want gay couples to be able to protect their marijuana plants with automatic weapons"

What did all that showboating about rights and whatnot get us? A fat lot of modern society.

Reject libertarianism. Embrace radical traditionalism.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
christianknight 2 points ago +2 / -0

That party is run by the jews now

1
lariloles 1 point ago +1 / -0

always has been.

most liberatarian figures were jews.

1
PurestEvil 1 point ago +1 / -0

The party is not Libertarian. They are champions of communism. And they are clowns.

1
PizzaphilePodesta 1 point ago +1 / -0

(((staff)))

1
FuckReddit4545 1 point ago +1 / -0

So glad I ditched that shit a few years ago. It sounds nice on paper, and only works assuming your enemies aren't commies. They are soft, and pretty much got taken over after Trump won. The LP is a joke.

1
yudsfpbc 1 point ago +1 / -0

They call misusing made up pronouns an attack.

1
Trolldozer 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not a degenerate :(

1
ApexVeritas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Regardless of institution, concentration of power attracts the corrupt, who will use that power for their own ends, to the detriment of the people. Corrupted local government is closer to the people and more easily changed, or more easily left, allowing people to vote with their feet. A corrupted federal government is impossible to leave, without renouncing citizenship. A corrupted company is easily avoided, if it doesn't pollute the environment. A corrupted economy and government, through corruption intertwining them together, is hell on earth, and what's currently happening.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
ApexVeritas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of course. That's what I was saying at the end of my comment. All these evil bastards are working together in the private and public sector against the people. The private sector isn't really private anymore either, since the government is knowingly and willfully hurting legitimate businesses that run counter to their narrative and compete with the businesses that their friends are running, which are also pushing the narrative.

1
marvinthehaggler 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Rights".

1
AlFreeman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Attacks on any individual are an attack on liberty. It's sort of redundant specifying groups unless you're virtue signaling.

1
johnmic07 1 point ago +1 / -0

Attacks on pedophiles or terrorists are an attack on liberty!

1
Non-believer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Perversion for profit

1
barwhack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Reproduction is unforgivingly designed, like electricity. The juice only flows to generation, if the plug is male-female.

Wait a generation or two. Watch the steriles liberate.

1
thepilotofmoya 1 point ago +1 / -0

God I can't wait for the backlash to really get going.

1
Non-believer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Give it a push

2
thepilotofmoya 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm doing my part. But I'm no fedposter.

1
Honeypot02 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct, and using the government to prop up this ideology is also an attack on my liberty. Keep it out of schools and publicly funded institutions

1
grass_toucher 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are not libertarians. They call themselves libertarians in order to scare people away from freedom. I think degeneracy does not have a place on the political compas, just because there are faggots supporting freedom it does not mean freedom is bad.

1
Slamdangles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Aren't trans people wildly confused and mentally ill? I don't see any sense in attacking them. It's kicking the little guy when he's down, no need for it.

That doesn't mean, however, you can't stand up for what you believe in, and vote with your wallet. Doing so isn't attacking them.

3
Anophthalmus 3 points ago +3 / -0

The way I see it, they agressively groom your children to join their side, so if you want a society free of degeneracy, you'll have to somehow get more voters on your side than there are brainwashed fags on the other one. It doesn't help that, in good ole 'murica, you basically have to vote between leftist degeneracy gone full throttle and leftist degeneracy on a speed limit. Any other party might as well not exist.

You'll have to stop the troon's propaganda, an action which they'll percieve as an attack against them because it hurts their fee-fees.

The same can't be said about your average, garden variety retard. Those ones don't groom your kids. I say that all trannies should be sent to a straightening camp(there are therapy methods that turn fags into straight people, and they're surprisingly succesful!). If they view this as an attack, then I'm sorry, I'd rather defend myself with """"""violence"""""" than kiss tranny ass like a spineless cuck.