Comments (26)
sorted by:
AustrianPictorem 56 points ago +56 / -0

Money, the more diverse the workforce the less likely it is for them to unionize, also makes easier to import cheaper foreign labour

ideology 15 points ago +15 / -0

Came here to say this. The more infighting billionaires and wannabe billionaires create, the less of a threat the public is to them. Oh, and also cheap slave labor that can be threatened with deportation if they don't comply is a major plus.

Smol_Gobbo 30 points ago +30 / -0

They stand to gain BofA deez nuts.

TheMalkman 14 points ago +14 / -0

Came to comment this, fuck BofA

FrancoReanimated 21 points ago +21 / -0

This reminds me of the watermelonium meme.

ManxomeBro 16 points ago +16 / -0

Fuck em. Work for yourself or consult/contract so you'll get paid 2x as much and not have to sit in meetings with pointless career women

LegacyAccount 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is the way. Currently slaving away for to put first and last on a little shop for myself.

deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
MemesCanBeDreams 11 points ago +11 / -0

This was likely generated in a boardroom meeting headed with a powerpoint of diversity being the future. As technology gets more and more sophisticated and replaces workers, they would focus on popularity and therehence this angle. Imagine, never being accused of being racist, ever - a feat only ever accomplished by Colonel Sanders. It's an arms race to see who can virtue signal the most before we reach that singularity.

Human incompetence would account for very little, but having a history of even remotely being accused would end up being the deciding factor of whether or not someone does business with you - and so on. Did you NOT stand up with BLM?! This will become a cardinal sin in the mainstream.

Formerlurker92 11 points ago +11 / -0

Unions don't form in fractured groups. That's a win for big business

TheWestYearZero 4 points ago +4 / -0

You could seat all of the directors of all of the companies in the world with more than $1 bn in revenues at a sit down meal in the Hyatt ballroom (yes, they would look down their noses at it).

Most of those directors would have directorships on certainly more than twenty companies. I am sure that you have seen diagrams of these cross-directorships.

These people have a plan for the world that has been handed down to them by the most powerful of those present, the banks.

An important part of this plan is to destroy the West, or at least to massively reduce its levels of consumption and its population levels. In racially homogenous counties this would create a dangerous backlash against the governing class (them).

So 1. they import more people from countries where there is no tradition of a high standard of living or political answerability. 2. they set all of the non-whites in heritage White countries against the Whites.

Why do they find it necessary to do this? Why do they believe they must destroy Western consumption levels?

Because we have reached the end of cheap fossil fuels and numerous other resources. So North America will be shut down and its resources will be consumed by China/Asia. That will keep the system going for perhaps another 150 years.

americathegr888 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because we have reached the end of cheap fossil fuels and numerous other resources.

This isn't why, at all.

TooFineAPoint 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's another form of regulation that smaller competitors can't afford.

Push woke shit, spend marketing dollars on it, hire woke people, make it all part of the ecosystem.

If any small and more nimble competitor follows the trend, they will bleed money and be less effective. It's imposing a phantom cost on everyone (that goes along... and let's be honest, almost no one is willing to go against).

Nothing to do with unions, lol. Most or all unions have racial and sexual diversity up the yang these days.

MilkPilled 3 points ago +3 / -0

BofA? How about BofA deez nuts bitch

Tourgen 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are bending the knee to the Progressive Death Cult, signalling their compliance. It costs them almost nothing. They can pay lip-service and try to avoid government intervention, lawsuits, and "cancelling".

and yeah, they don't give a shit what the right thinks about them. The right has no social or political power.

c2sky 1 point ago +1 / -0

BoA isn't bending the knee. They are planting a boot.

womp_squared 2 points ago +2 / -0

Saw black guy. Read Bofa. Thought they were trying to say 'Both of' in jive talk.

chipmunkson16speed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do corporations announce their controversial diversity initiatives and even admit that it’s just for money? They do it cause they can. They do it cause no amount of screeching and boycotting will hurt their margins.

Tarrock 1 point ago +1 / -0

It stops another Occupy Wallstreet

the-new-style 1 point ago +1 / -0

Graduate Recruitment

Call_Me_Kaiser 1 point ago +1 / -0

Less chance for unions to form and they can keep importing cheap foreign labour this way

PostyMcGee 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe there was a study showing diversity of thought can help a company, diversity of race not so much. Unless You're Amazon and Whole Foods trying to stop unionization.

Antisemite-I-Guess 1 point ago +1 / -0

They get Satan

GeorgeFentanylFloyd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cheap foreign labor that has permanent downward pressure on wages so the great reset can install a permanent working class

c2sky 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's a FORCED benefit for business because of the ESG scores. Banks screen on it so companies that aren't woke enough get worse treatment. Less access to capital.