167
Comments (49)
sorted by:
56
Leadforpeds 56 points ago +56 / -0

Can't count to two, pathetic

12
ThrowawayRV 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yeah that's the interpretation I had, he's saying he's so dumb he can't count to two.

35
samoan62 35 points ago +36 / -1

Is there anyone left who cares about lolbertards?

36
Spoonks [S] 36 points ago +37 / -1

Nope, lefties hate them as much as we do. For different reasons, leftists hate them because they're "racist and fascist" we hate lolberts because they're degeneates.

12
HookersonBlow 12 points ago +12 / -0

Hahaha while reading your comment "leftist hate them because they're 'racist fascist' we hate them because..."

I was thinking "they're not racist and fascist". But then I ran into "degenerate" and the joke in my head came to an end.

12
gamexa 12 points ago +12 / -0

Most Republicans are basically lolberts, "socially liberal but fiscally conservative."

28
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 28 points ago +28 / -0

Socially Hebrew, but fiscally Jewish

1
PepesCovfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lmao that is friggin hilarious.

5
PepesCovfefe 5 points ago +5 / -0

Whenever I am conversing with someone who says this, I ask them very innocently “what are you conserving exactly?” (learned that here) - no one has been able to respond. Then I reply “ok so you’re not conservative per say, you just don’t want the government to take more of your money” and they generally agree, so then I say “so you’re a typical democrat that doesn’t want to pay more taxes themselves” then they get pissed.

2
TheWestYearZero 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is a brutal, brutal trap.

4
TendieMan 4 points ago +4 / -0

lolberts do.

21
conso0mer 21 points ago +22 / -1

Only 1 gender

Men

Women are property /s (mostly /s)

14
Lean 14 points ago +16 / -2

There is only one race: white. All other humanoid creatures are animals.

11
DEPORT_DOOMERS 11 points ago +12 / -1

Welllll the only race that’s not closely related to whites is blacks. Chinks and spics are closer to white genetically and behaviorally

6
Monky 6 points ago +6 / -0

Spics are closer to whites because they’re mostly mutts (white and native) interestingly though, most U.S nogs have a decent amount of white in them, yet african blacks tend to be slightly better than them.

6
Consumer9033 6 points ago +6 / -0

Because the American nogs are part Irish

8
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm a filthy Mick, and this made me laugh

2
TakenusernameA 2 points ago +2 / -0

AM Irish, can confirm that we are indeed subhuman.

0
TheWestYearZero 0 points ago +1 / -1

Doesn'tvrace mixing produce psychopathies?

12
CAPSLOCK44 12 points ago +12 / -0

They’re getting desperate because they lost a lot of clout from covid. They went from wanting people to be free to “giant corporations should be able to force you to get a vaccine to enter their store and turn you into a second class citizen for having a brain.” They’re losing a lot of members to people like us who see the truth about human nature and the disgusting degeneracy that needs to be killed.

5
TrueRealist 5 points ago +5 / -0

They’re losing a lot of members to people like us

Truth. I believe that there is a legit right-wing movement growing at this moment, not the "colorblind", "equality" infused garbage known as modern cuckservative. Have seen people questioning race and kikes and traditional neo-con websites, and even IRL people are starting to see that we aren't going to be able to vote our way out of this.

Imo, we have all already chosen our side for the upcoming war. Either the amount of garbage going on in the world today bothers you, or it doesn't. If you aren't questioning now, you probably never will.

4
Monky 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wait never mind, forgot what post I was on and thought you were talking about liberals, I’m retarded.

5
paulrnelson 5 points ago +5 / -0

lolberts are pretty much just neoliberals at this point

2
Monky 2 points ago +3 / -1

They went from wanting people to be free

They never wanted that, that was just their cover.

11
Lean 11 points ago +11 / -0
15
Wolfram 15 points ago +15 / -0

Even if it was a social construct, it doesn't mean it can be changed in the blink of an eye.

4
Lean 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly.

3
Thehoboinyourtrash 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even if it was, nothing that's segregated is segregated using "gender", it's segregated using sex.

2
BwonsamdiTheDead 2 points ago +2 / -0

(((Goldstein)))

Hmmm....

1
Lean 1 point ago +1 / -0

EVERY SINGLE TIME!

2
AnAngryPotato 2 points ago +2 / -0

You don't need to post links to prove that men have dicks and women have pussies.

5
DEPORT_DOOMERS 5 points ago +5 / -0

Keep defending libertarian. We fucking told you.

4
sellyourcloak 4 points ago +4 / -0

Libertarianism is so cowardly. It’s what conservatives turn to when they get tired of being labeled “uncool” by people who are degenerate anyway. I know quite a few libertarians. They all post the same shitty political compass memes and when you tell you them that there is no such thing as Libertarian Socialism except in theory / academia, they do the whole “lulz u mad bro” thing that all faggots do when they don’t want to lose an argument. I hate them. Their bitch-ass “you do you and I’ll do me” bullshit is partly responsible for the fall of western civilization.

3
BasedOrthoBro 3 points ago +3 / -0

Their entire purpose is to slow down the implementation of degenerate liberalism so that it’s a bit more subtle and easier to bare for normies.

The “you do you, Ill do me” you mentioned is exactly why we are where we are. Now we’re at pedo tranny story hour with kids because of these spineless degenerates.

3
KosherConservative 3 points ago +4 / -1

EVERYBODY SHOULD BE FREE

CORPORATIONS SHOULD BE FREE TO TAKE YOUR LIBERTIES

"The Libertarian platform"

3
Tarrock 3 points ago +3 / -0

One of the few times I wish I still had a twitter account. Would tell those fuckers that's why their party is a joke and why they'll never get elected. Good luck pulling that shit in Texas!

3
yudsfpbc 3 points ago +3 / -0

Libertarians have always been wonky.

They like the idea of liberty, but they don't like the idea of what it takes to have liberty.

"Can't we all just get along?" isn't a sane question for anyone who has any idea of what history has to teach us about human nature.

2
Drunk_Shitposter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Libertarian Party of Texas is controlled opposition. Nothing more, nothing less.

2
6gorgilianthact 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can someone explain to me what they mean by gender? From the little I've looked into it, it seems that gender is the social expression of sex. So masculine and feminine are gender characteristics correlated with male and female sex. But why the hell would there be more than those two? Sure people vary in degrees as to how well they embody the ultimate male or female archetype (obviously). Are they trying to assign terms to these variances? So a man who likes to cook and a woman who plays golf would not be "male" or "female", but some other things for some fucking reason? I've seen people mention that there are things that "don't fit the male-female binary", but aren't those things then just not related to sex or gender? Why force all human activity and emotion into this one thing?

I honestly can not fathom what the perceived point of all this shit is. I guess at the top its subversive to be subversive, but what do the average retards pushing it think? What does this line of thinking add to anything?

2
TheWestYearZero 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nobody thinks. They follow, obey, react, ....

2
Flammenwerfer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Libertarian civil war

2
elodrian 2 points ago +2 / -0

When Libertarians take a Six Moral Foundations test they tend to score 100% Liberty and 0% Care, Fairness, Authority, Sanctity, Loyalty. Contrast that with leftists who value Care and Fairness only or Conservatives who value all. Why would someone who values personal freedom and doesn't value sanctity or care choose Two Genders! as their hill to die on?

3
GarfeelLzonya 3 points ago +3 / -0

libertarianism is one of those meme ideologies where usually some teenager will decide he's a libertarian because he wants to smoke legal weed so then they just completely base everything around that (because then they don't have to think about it). so then when someone asks them something political they can go "hmm so what would the LIBERTARIAN position on this be??" and then they just say that regardless of if they think it or not. A bona fide retard trap ideology.

2
hkdlxohk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Liberty Hangout, especially their twitter, is pretty based

2
chipmunkson16speed 2 points ago +2 / -0

There’s a reason why the libertarian-to-nationalist pipeline exists

2
weizkangz 2 points ago +2 / -0

First thing to do: Say sex instead of gender.

1
NuckFiggsNateHiggs 1 point ago +1 / -0

Libertarianism is an inherently contradictory ideology. They refuse to stand up or even blatantly support homosexuality/transgenderism for the sake of "muh freedums", even though homosexuals and transgenders don't simply want to be left alone and tolerated, they want to force their illness on everyone else and make society to conform to them. You could say the same exact thing for racial minorities as well, especially after the last year or so of "fuck whitey".

1
Hotswaps 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty sure they’re saying they can’t count to two

1
bluewhiteandred 1 point ago +1 / -0

free to believe in however many genders

oof to me the anti-libertarian sentiment as expressed in these replies is tiresome, liberty is basically a neutral thing - it can be conservative or liberal, just like having a government can be conservative or liberal

The anti-libertarians here who want a State that bans abortion for example, wouldn't reject all government simply because the State currently allows abortion.

Similarly, many libertarians want a free nation (nation is different than a State) based on conservative values.

It's just weird to see people talk about libertarians favoring child abuse while they champion States that are literally allowing children to be aborted (not that there aren't a lot of lolbertarians who are in to many weird things, but I don't think of this as being a reason to reject freedom totally in general)

Basically I think we agree that whether we have a big government or no central government, we want society to have conservative and Christian values