104
Comments (19)
sorted by:
24
KarenSlayer 24 points ago +24 / -0

Post physique is a valid, logical rebuttal to political arguments. You don't have to be a bodybuilder, but at least have a healthy body. To claim that your opinion on how society should be run to best take care of everybody is worth listening to, the bare minimum qualification is to show that you can take care of the one body you have most control over.

19
Crockett 19 points ago +19 / -0

I unironically think this is the best thing about TikTok.

On Reddit, you only see words, and you can imagine you're debating some dignified intellectual typing from his study surrounded by mahogany bookshelves.

On Twitter, it's mostly just text, but you can see the genre of their avatar (selfie thot, soy masker, cat lady journalist, or furry) at a glance.

On TikTok, however, you get to see them in all their glory. Tie-die bowl cut, huge septum piercing, enough eyeliner to repaint the titanic, tattoos three through seven.

It's the "These are the people who call you incel online" memes except in real time. And they do it on purpose! What's not to love?

5
PurestEvil 5 points ago +5 / -0

More than that. Prove that you are part of society, and not just a recluse or an outcast. Who wants to be lectured about how the world works by someone who fails to take part in it?

A man must have credibility. His word need to be accompanied by his physical being. He must stand to what he said and be willing to fight for it. Why should we care about the opinions of an insect regarding humanity? We pass by the insect as we please, and we don't bother with what it thinks. It is beneath us, it can't even harm us. Its ideas are of no consequence - just as with soy faggots.

They are basically children who say uninhibited, ignorant garbage. They are not able to stand to their word. He is at the mercy of the strong and those with power - be it influence, wealth, intellect, wisdom, leadership.

A weak body indicates a weak mind. And weak minds fall into submission and are easily overwhelmed by whatever it is bombarded most. So no wonder they utter their communist nonsense like an NPC - the standard phrases, the boring concepts - nothing new, nothing interesting. The same goes for most women - submissiveness is a core trait of femininity.

That is no basis to have any reasonable debate. It is a dance of offense and defence - you must be lay out strong arguments and counter the arguments of the other.

14
StillplayenSometimes [S] 14 points ago +14 / -0

Ngers lel

7
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 7 points ago +7 / -0

Lice culture

4
LesboPregnancyScare 4 points ago +4 / -0

all the time. I also disregard fat peoples opinions about everything and anything.

4
MemesCanBeDreams 4 points ago +4 / -0

You can usually tell. I wouldn't discredit everyone, but if their thumbnail consists of their soylent maw being stretched open to inhuman proportions I have the gist of who they're trying to grab and I don't dignify it with a view, or on a whimsy never give the algorithm that amount of time for them to get adsense or positive statistical data and simply dislike.

2
StillplayenSometimes [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

No for sure. i had no nuance in my post. A notable acception is the guy from don't walk, run! A conservative(?) Channel. I thought he may have even been gay. https://youtu.be/wr8XiaBo-wY

I have learned from lefty intellectuals, before, I've gotten good data from them, it tends to be their interpretation and their values that are the problem; Their material has helped me sharpen my own arguments, although I'm more inclined to put a sword in their chest these days than debate. I've also learned from random soy faced faggots', I've gleamed moral and life lessons on how not to be and more information from life.

2
MemesCanBeDreams 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is a good policy to have I suppose. If I'm looking for it I'll engage it, but if I'm not you have maybe 10 seconds to not annoy me.

4
Vulkanian 4 points ago +4 / -0

I watched a video about Discovery Channel’s fraud documentaries (basically the ones about cryptids) and the guy in the video had peak coomer face. He also compared people who didn’t want to wear masks to idiots who believe in Bigfoot. He also kept doing really cringe skits where he pretended to be drunk.

It was the most infantilizing, pseudoscientific, pseudointellectual video I’ve ever had the misfortune of watching.

Think his channel was called Billiam or something.

4
Enoch_Mosley 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sure, there is a channel on one of my favorite interests that puts out well-researched, in-depth, regular content. But it's unwatchable to me because the presenter is such a massive fucking jewface dork. I listen for 30 seconds and have to shut it off.

3
TheWestYearZero 3 points ago +3 / -0

That is very annoying.

It is like when you are enjoying a nice history of Constantoionople and for some fucking reason Hitler and the holobunga comes up as a topic.

What the fuck?!

This is not uncommon in books of all kinds nowadays. They seem to have put the pedal to the metal on REEEEEE Nazis!

I was just reading last night a book on the mutual evolutions of language, the horse and the wheel but it was introduced by ten pages on how bad the nazi archaeological program was and that no races are superior to other races.

Very hard to get past that to the meat of the book.

2
weizkangz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Physiognomy?

2
TheWestYearZero 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is real.

2
sex_selector 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your instincts can pick up on someone’s general fitness based on how their face comes together. Weird face == weird brain.

2
ThrowawayRV 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do you ever just discard someone's opinion because they have lefty face

Yes.

2
StillplayenSometimes [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just by looking at this guy I have him figured out

2
TheWestYearZero 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lapsed Lutheran?

Considering adoption from Haiti?

1
UsurperJoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

They always have unhappy expressions too